The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
We will let Lord A. Loftus describe his audience on the 2nd at
Livadia, himself: “I had an audience with the Emperor of Russia
to‐day at Livadia, when His Majesty was pleased to receive me with
his customary kindness and cordiality (_sic_). After some gracious
enquiries after my family, His Majesty at once opened on the Eastern
question. His Majesty stated that he had that morning received a
telegram from Constantinople announcing the probable acceptance of
the armistice, and he read to me another telegram reporting that
orders had been already sent by the Porte to their commanders to
suspend military operations. This, His Majesty observed, was very
satisfactory. On my observing on the _sudden change which had taken
place between the Sunday when I had seen the Chancellor and the
following day when the ultimatum was despatched_, His Majesty said
that this had been caused by the intelligence he had received of the
complete discomfiture of the Servian army, and his fear that it might
be followed by similar atrocities to those which had occurred in
Bulgaria....”[51]
It would indeed be a pity to spoil the uniqueness of this _tableau_
by any superfluous commentary, but a despatch from Sir H. Elliot
at Constantinople, dated on the same day as this audience (2nd
November), throws some further light on this already luminous
incident. “In the course of conversation this morning with General
Ignatieff, I remarked that I understood that he had returned from
Livadia with instructions to present his ultimatum. He answered
_that he had brought it with him_ with a discretionary authority to
withhold it if he thought desirable. _This is a rather different
version_ from that which he had previously given to my colleagues
and myself, when he told us on Tuesday (31st October) that he _had
received the ultimatum two days before_, and that he had taken on
himself the responsibility of withholding it, but had now imperative
orders to execute his instructions. It is impossible to doubt
that he had kept his Government fully informed of the progress of
his negotiations with the Porte, or that they were perfectly well
aware that his own proposals had been accepted with very trifling
modifications, upon which an understanding could very easily be
arrived at. It is evident enough that the sudden sending in of the
ultimatum was decided upon in the hope that by an immediate cessation
of hostilities, and the acceptance of an armistice, the fall of
Alexinatz would be averted. The capture of the Servian positions at
Junis made it certain that “the occupation of Alexinatz and Deligrad
would soon follow, and the only hope of saving the Servians and the
Russian Auxiliary troops from this mortification lay in the chance of
stopping the Turks before they had time to reap the fruits of their
success.”[52]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account