Bracciolini, Poggio, 1380-1459; Italy -- History -- 1268-1492
[251] The catalogue of reliques of Roman architecture, which Poggio
has inserted in the interesting pröemium to his dialogue _De varietate
Fortunæ_, evinces the diligence and care with which he had surveyed
the ruins of ancient Rome. This catalogue did not escape the extensive
researches of Gibbon, who has introduced it into the 71st chapter of his
_Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire._
[252] “Poggius noster sæpe mecum est; reliquias civitatis probe callens
nos comitatur.”—_Ambrosii Traversarii Epistolæ, p. 407._
In a letter to Bartolomeo Facio, Poggio thus invites him to visit the
ruins of Rome. “Video te cupere urbem visere, et certe nisi incoeptum
opus, ut ais, impediret hortarer te ad inspiciendas reliquias ejus urbis
quæ quondam orbis lumen præclarissimum fuit. Equidem quamvis in eâ jam
pluribus annis ab ipsâ juventute fuerim versatus, tamen quotide tamquam
novus incola tantarum rerum admiratione obstupesco, recreoque persæpe
animum visu eorum ædificiorum, quæ stulti propter ingenii imbecillitatem
a Dæmonibus facta dicunt.”—_Facius de viris Illustribus, p. 97._
[253] _Mehi Vita Ambrosii Traversarii, p. lii._
[254] _Mehi Vita Ambrosii Traversarii, p. lii._ _Poggii Epist. citat. a
Ton. tom. i. p. 258._
[255] _Poggii Opera, p. 321._
[256] _Ibid._
[257] _Ibid, p. 329._
[258] _Mehi Vita Ambrosii Traversarii, p. lii. liii._
[259] From an expression which Poggio uses in a letter on the subject of
Francesco’s conduct, addressed to Andreolo Giustiniano, it should seem,
either that the busts did not answer the expectation which he had formed
concerning the exquisiteness of their workmanship, or that he suspected
that Francesco had substituted inferior pieces of sculpture, in the place
of those destined for him by Suffretus. The following is the expression
in question. “Cum Suffretus quidem Rhodius ei consignasset tria capita
marmorea, et signum integrum duorum fere cubitorum, quæ Franciscus se ad
me allaturum promisit, _capita quædam dedit_, signo autem me fraudavit,”
&c. Perhaps, however, quædam is, by an error of the press, substituted
for quidem.
[260] _Poggii Opera, p. 329._
[261] _Poggii Opera, p. 329._
[262] The admirer of ancient art will find the principles, the
observance of which led to the perfection to which it was carried by the
Greeks, clearly and forcibly explained in the eighteenth, nineteenth,
and twentieth pages of Mr. Fuseli’s _Lectures on Painting_. Of this
work it may be asserted, that hardly any composition in the English
language comprehends an equal quantity of thought in the same compass
of expression. Almost every sentence which it contains is a theme of
reflection, a text, pregnant with the most useful instruction.
[263] _Poggii Epist. lvii. p. 181._
[264] _Poggii Opera, p. 357, & seq._
[265] _Poggii Opera, p. 366._
[266] _See note to Tonelli’s translation, vol. i. p. 264._
[267] _Poggii vita a Recanatio, p. xiv._
[268] _Poggii vita a Recanatio, p. xiv._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account