The Life of Sir Humphry Davy, Bart. LL.D., Volume 2 (of 2)Paris, John Ayrton
History
The Life of Sir Humphry Davy, Bart. LL.D., Volume 2 (of 2)
Paris, John Ayrton
Chemists -- England -- Biography; Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829
Having pointed out the channel through which Iodine first fell into
the hands of Davy, let us pursue its history. The first public
notice of its existence was read by Clement at the Institute, on
the 29th of November 1813. At the meeting of the 6th of December,
Gay-Lussac, who had only received some 'X' a few days previous to
this date, presented a short note, in which he gave the name of
_Iode_ to the body, and threw out a hint as to its great analogy to
chlorine, while he stated that two hypotheses might be formed as
to its nature, that it might be considered as a simple substance,
or as a compound of oxygen. On the 13th of the same month, a
letter addressed to M. le Chevalier Cuvier, and dated December
11th, was read from Davy to the Institute, in which he offered
a general view of its chemical nature and relations;[6] and on
the 20th of January 1814, he communicated to the Royal Society
of London, a long and elaborate paper, dated Paris, December 10,
1813, and entitled, "Some Experiments and Observations on a new
Substance, which becomes a violet-coloured gas by Heat." In this
paper, while the author assigned to Gay-Lussac all the credit to
which his communication of the 6th of December may be supposed to
entitle him, he evidently felt that some explanation was due to the
chemical world for his having pursued the enquiry. "M. Gay-Lussac,"
he observes, "is still engaged in experiments on this subject,
and from his activity and great sagacity, a complete chemical
history of it may be anticipated. But as the mode of procuring the
substance is now known to the chemical world in general, and as
the combinations and agencies of it offer an extensive field for
enquiry, and will probably occupy the attention of many persons;
and as the investigation of it is not pursued by the discoverer
himself, nor particularly by the gentlemen to whom it was first
communicated, I shall not hesitate to lay before the Royal Society
an account of the investigations I have made upon it; and I do
this with the less scruple, as my particular manner of viewing
the phenomena has led me to some new results, which probably will
not be considered by the Society as without interest in their
relation to the general theory of chemistry, and in their possible
application to some of the useful arts."
[6] See _Annales de Chimie_, tome 88, p. 322. It appears from Mr.
Faraday's Journal, that he worked upon Iodine with a borrowed
Voltaic pile, at his hotel, on the morning of the 11th; and the
results of his experiments are described at the conclusion of the
above letter.
It was not until August 1814, that Gay-Lussac read his paper on
the subject, which was subsequently published in the _Annales de
Chimie_.
After the above short, but I trust honest statement, can any
reasonable doubt exist, that, if Davy had not visited Paris, Iodine
would have remained at the end of the year 1814, as it had been for
two preceding years--the unknown X?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account