Although there is no reason to suppose that Sir Isaac Newton was
a believer in the doctrines of alchymy, yet we are informed by
the Reverend Mr. Law that he had been a diligent student of Jacob
Behmen’s writings, and that there were found among his papers copious
abstracts from them in his own handwriting.[114] He states also that
Sir Isaac, together with one Dr. Newton, his relation, had, in the
earlier part of his life, set up furnaces, and were for several months
at work in quest of the philosopher’s tincture. These statements may
receive some confirmation from the fact, that there exist among the
Portsmouth papers many sheets, in Sir Isaac’s own writing, of Flammel’s
Explication of Hieroglyphic Figures, and in another hand, many sheets
of William Yworth’s _Processus Mysterii Magni Philosophicus_, and also
from the manner in which Sir Isaac requests Mr. Aston to inquire after
one Borry in Holland, who always went clothed in green, and who was
said to possess valuable secrets; but Mr. Law has weakened the force of
his own testimony, when he asserts that Newton borrowed the doctrine
of attraction from Behmen’s first three propositions of eternal nature.
On the 7th December, 1675, Sir Isaac Newton communicated to the
Royal Society a paper entitled _An hypothesis explaining properties
of light_, in which he, for the first time, introduces his opinions
respecting ether, and employs them to explain the nature of light, and
the cause of gravity. “He was induced,” he says, “to do this, because
he had observed the heads of some great virtuosos to run much upon
hypotheses, and he therefore gave one which he was inclined to consider
as the most probable, if he were obliged to adopt one.”[115]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account