The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the History of Penny Postage, Vol. 2 (of 2)Hill, Rowland, Sir
History
The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the History of Penny Postage, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Hill, Rowland, Sir
Hill, Rowland, Sir, 1795-1879; Postal service -- Great Britain -- Rates
This recommendation the Treasury so far adopted as to concede to the
Postmaster-General the appointment to all postmasterships where the
salary exceeded £175 per annum, observing that the principle of making
such appointment the reward of merit "would be inapplicable in all
cases where the post office is held in conjunction with a private
business or profession." And here I may remark that, though it is true
that the powers and responsibilities of the chief office can never
be placed on a completely satisfactory footing until all subordinate
appointments are placed at its disposal, still the concession made
was very large and highly valuable, and the relinquishment of so much
patronage reflects great honour on the Liberal Administration then in
power.[116]
The last recommendation which I shall cite is one of far more
importance than would appear on the face of it, viz., that the
Postmaster-General "should determine the future complement of each
class according to the nature and amount of duty to be performed in
it." It might seem incredible that such a recommendation should be
needed, but hitherto the number in a class had had but little reference
to the amount of duty that fell to it to perform, and indeed, as
mentioned in an earlier part of this narrative,[117] the division
implied no real classification whatever, so that in many instances men
of high class were, through lack of ability, employed at low-class
work, and _vice versa_.
The Report of the Commissioners, being referred by the Treasury to
the Postmaster-General, Lord Canning, and having received his almost
unqualified approval, was ordered, with little more exception than that
already mentioned, to be carried into effect.
_Competitive Examinations._
The following entry is on a subject of some difficulty, and of great
importance:--
"_March 4th, 1854._--The Report of the Commissioners on the Civil
Service generally has been issued. Some months ago they requested
my opinion on the draft of their Report, in which they had
recommended that the patronage should be accumulated chiefly in
the hands of the Treasury (_i.e._, of the Whipper-in for the time
being). To this arrangement I objected decidedly, and I now see
that they have abandoned it, making the admission to the Service
in all cases to depend on a competitive examination, and thus
abandoning patronage altogether. This will not, I fear, work well.
The competition will, I think, be necessarily thrown on matters
of secondary importance. Indeed the Commissioners propose that it
shall be literary. The plan is attracting much notice from the
public, and is earnestly backed by the _Times_. The Report is in
many respects excellent. Indeed the objects aimed at are, without
exception, highly creditable to the Commissioners and to the
Government."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account