The life of the emperor Francis Joseph — John Shaqi
The life of the emperor Francis JosephGribble, Francis Henry
History
The life of the emperor Francis Joseph
Gribble, Francis Henry
Austria -- Court and courtiers; Austria -- History -- Franz Joseph I, 1848-1916; Franz Joseph I, Emperor of Austria, 1830-1916
Attitude of the Hungarians towards Francis Joseph—They denounce him
as a traitor, and banish him from Hungary—Contempt of Austrians for
Hungarians—The conquest of Hungary with Russian help—Repression and
atrocities—Women flogged by order of Marshal Haynau—Marshal Haynau
himself flogged by Barclay and Perkins’ draymen in London, and spat
upon by women in Brussels—Popular song written on that occasion.
The state of things which Francis Joseph found on his accession was
this: In Vienna, all was over except the shooting and the shouting.
Tyrol—the Vendée of Austria—was, as it always had been, loyal. In
Bohemia, Windischgraetz had crushed the insurrection as he might have
cracked a nut. But Italy and Hungary were still formidable, and had to
be reconquered.
In Italy there was a renewal of the fighting; and the work done at
Custozza had to be done over again at Novara—Charles Albert then
taking a leaf out of the book of the Emperor Ferdinand and abdicating
in favour of his son, the famous Victor Emmanuel. In Hungary, the work
of conquest had hardly even been begun; and though Jellaçiç had held
the Hungarians up at the gates of Vienna, they were in a position to
hold him up many times before he could get to the gates of Buda-Pesth.
So that the position was extremely critical.
It had been hastily assumed that Francis Joseph would be popular in
Hungary. He had once been sent there, as a boy, to represent the
Emperor at some public function, had made a fluent speech in the
Hungarian language, and had been vociferously cheered. No doubt the
precocious _bonhomie_ of his manner had made a favourable impression;
but that was not enough at a time when the old Hungarian privileges and
the new Hungarian constitution were at issue. The affability of the
sovereign was no substitute for the rights of his subjects; and the
Hungarians would only consent to love, and be loyal to, the Austrian
Emperor “on terms.”
And those terms could not be granted. Francis Joseph, brought up in the
school of Metternich, would hardly have been disposed to grant them
if his hands had been free; and the men who stood by him—and over
him—such men as Windischgraetz and Felix Schwarzenberg—would not
have let him grant them if he had wanted to. As they had already saved
Vienna for him, so they now proposed to save Austria and Hungary for
him—but in their own way, and not in his. Knowing what they wanted,
they told him what he wanted; and they had control of the machinery. In
order to understand their proceedings, we must define their attitude,
noting that they were, in the first place, aristocrats, and, in the
second place, Teutons.
[Illustration: THE EMPEROR FRANCIS JOSEPH AT THE TIME OF HIS ACCESSION
IN 1848.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account