The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 1 (of 2)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 1 (of 2)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Whitefield, George, 1714-1770
"I have heard it rumoured that you have been refused, by some
of our brethren, the use of their pulpits; but, as you have
submitted some of your discourses to the public censure, and
as I have not heard it once suggested by the most invidious
that there is anything contained in them in the least repugnant
to the doctrines of Christianity in general, or those of the
Established Church in particular, I hope it cannot be true.
"But be this as it may, let me exhort you, sir, not to be
discouraged or dismayed at any opposition that you may meet
with in your good designs; but preserve (in the midst of the
_dangerous_ applauses you meet with from the crowded audiences
that everywhere attend your preaching) that _meekness_ and
_humility_ which must be inseparable from the doctrines you seek
to propagate, and more than any one thing (beside the blessing
of God) insure the success of your labours, and demonstrate
to the world that you are yourself under the happy influences
which you seek to spread; that your actions are regulated by
the doctrines you preach; and that God's glory and the religion
of the blessed Jesus are the principal--the only motives that
animate your conduct and your views.
"This will entitle you to the blessing of God, and the
approbation of all good men; and particularly to the hearty
good wishes of your affectionate, though unknown brother in our
common Lord,
"A. B."
Another fact in Whitefield's narrative deserves attention, namely,
his Christian intercourse with Dissenters. In this respect, he was
far ahead of his friend Wesley. In Georgia, Wesley was treating
Dissenters with the supercilious tyranny of a High Church bigot. He
refused them the sacrament, until they first gave up their faith
and principles, and, like Richard Turner and his sons, submitted to
be re-baptized by him.[104] Respecting John Martin Bolzius, whose
beautiful letter he inserted in his Journal, under the date of
September, 1749, Wesley himself remarks, "What a truly Christian
piety and simplicity breathe in these lines! And yet this very man,
when I was at Savannah, did I refuse to admit to the Lord's table,
because he was not baptized--that is, not baptized by a minister
who had been episcopally ordained." One of the accusations against
Wesley, handed to the grand jury at Savannah, was that he "refused
the Office of the Dead to such as did not communicate with him;"
and among the findings of the jury were the following: that he had
refused the sacrament to William Gough, because he had heard William
Gough was a Dissenter; and that he would not allow William Aglionby
to stand godfather to the child of Henry Marley, because William
Aglionby had not been at the communion table with him.
[104] "A True and Historical Narrative of the Colony of Georgia.
1741."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account