The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 1 (of 2)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 1 (of 2)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Whitefield, George, 1714-1770
"We have heard of _Field-Conventicles_ in Scotland, among the
enthusiasts of that country; which yet, I think, were there
always suppressed by the authority of Church or State, or
both. We have had, in former times, something of this nature
in England, as practised by Brownists, Anabaptists, Quakers,
Ranters, or such like. But for a _clergyman of the Church of
England to pray_ and _preach in the fields_ in the country, or
in the _streets_ in the city, is _perfectly new_; never heard
of before; a _fresh honour_ to the _blessed age_, in which
_we_ have the happiness to live. To pray, preach, and sing
psalms in the streets and fields is worse, if possible, than
_intruding into pulpits_ by downright _violence_ and _breach
of the peace_; and then _denying_ the plain fact with the most
_infamous prevarication_.[203] I could say much here; but am
quite _ashamed_ to speak upon a subject which is a _shame_ and
_reproach_, not only to our _Church_ and _country_, but to
_human nature_ itself. Can it promote the Christian religion, to
turn it into riot, tumult, and confusion?--to make it ridiculous
and contemptible, and expose it to the scorn and scoffs of
infidels and atheists? If it be alleged, as I think it is, that
Christ and His apostles prayed and preached in the fields, on
mountains, and on the sea-shore,--I ask, Have these creatures
the same spirit and power that they had? Is Christianity now in
its infancy, as it was then? Was the Church then established
as it is now? Are we now to be converted to Christianity, from
Judaism or heathenism, as people were in those days? Or if we
were, are such false and spurious apostles as these able to
convert us? I might here very properly urge the _canons_ of the
Church of England, and the _laws_ of the civil state. But the
thing, though detestable and of most pernicious tendency, is,
in another view, too contemptible to be longer insisted upon.
It would likewise be endless, as well as nauseous, to make
reflections upon that rhapsody of madness, spiritual pride, and
little less than blasphemy, if not quite so, which this _field
preacher_ calls his _Journal_; and so I say no more of it. Go
not after these impostors and seducers; but shun them as you
would the plague. Those who run after them are the _enemies_ of
our _religion_ and Church. These _Protestant enthusiasts_, with
all _Protestant heretics, schismaticks, and false teachers_,
on the one hand; and the _free-thinkers, infidels, deists, and
atheists_, on the other, are doing the work of _Papists_ for
them, to their hearts' desire."
[203] See the _Weekly Miscellany_ concerning the forcible intrusion
into the pulpit at St. Margaret's, Westminster.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account