The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Whitefield, George, 1714-1770
“MY VERY DEAR SIR,――I purpose to preach at Oundle, in my way
to London. Glad shall I be to see two such friends, as you
and Mr. Hervey, though _incog_. I will endeavour to send you
timely notice. I would have neither of you expose yourselves
to needless contempt on my account. I think I can say that I am
willing to be forgotten, even by my friends, if Jesus Christ may
thereby be exalted. But then, I would not have my friends act
an inconsistent part towards that Friend of all――that Friend of
sinners, the glorious Emmanuel. Whilst you are afraid of men,
you will expose yourself to a thousand inconveniences. Your
polite company (unless you converse with them more as their
physician than as their companion) will prevail on you to such
compliances as will make you smart, when you retire into your
closet and reflect on the part you have acted. Before I shook
off the world, I often came out of company shorn of all my
strength, like poor Samson when he had lost his locks. But this
is a tender point.
“Go on, dear sir, and prove the strength of Jesus to be
yours. Continue instant in prayer, and you shall see and feel
infinitely greater things than you have yet seen or felt. I am
of your opinion, that there is seed sown in England, which will
grow up into a great tree. God’s giving some of the mighty and
noble a hearing ear forebodes future good. I do not despair of
seeing you a proclaimer of the unsearchable riches of Christ.
God be praised! that Mr. Hervey is so bold an advocate for his
blessed Lord.”
Whitefield was always in trouble, from one quarter or another. While
the ecclesiastical courts of Scotland were interdicting his preaching,
without mentioning his name, Lavington, the Bishop of Exeter, was
lashed into an unchristian rage against him. His Lordship of Exeter had
recently delivered a charge to the clergy of his diocese. Some unknown
wag circulated what pretended to be a manuscript copy of the charge,
but containing declarations of doctrine and Christian experience worthy
of Whitefield and Wesley themselves. Without authority, the _pretended_
charge was printed, and occasioned the publication of several pamphlets
in reply and congratulation. Meanwhile, however, Lavington, the
inveterate hater of Methodists and Moravians, was dubbed a Methodist.
This, to his lordship, was intolerable, and drew forth from him an
angry “declaration,” in which he charged the Methodist chiefs with
being the authors of the fraud. The charge was utterly unfounded; the
Countess of Huntingdon interfered; with great difficulty she obtained
a recantation from the infuriated prelate; and this was published in
the leading journals of the day. The following letter refers to this
disreputable _fracas_.
“GLASGOW, _October 5, 1748_.
“VERY DEAR SIR,――I received yours this morning, and think it my
duty to send you an immediate answer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account