Her trade is a very simple one, for her method is confined to inserting
her eggs, here, there and everywhere, in the still green flesh of the
apricot. Here there is no difficulty to overcome, and consequently no
art to be displayed by either mother or grub. The rostrum sinks into a
material which offers but a slight resistance; the egg is let down to
the bottom of the wound; and that is all. The establishment of the
family is a most summary proceeding; it reminds us of the practice of
the Larini.
The grub, for its part, has no need for talents of any sort. What would
it do with them? It feeds on the pulp of the fruit, which soon falls to
the ground and is reduced to a jelly. Life is easy in these liquescent
surroundings; the infant is bathed in fermenting pap. When the time
comes for it to take refuge in the subsoil, the jam-sodden grub has no
veil to tear, no wall to break through: the flesh of the apricot has
become a pinch of brown dust.
In the old days, the Anthidia, [47] partly weavers of cotton, partly
kneaders of resin, set me a difficult problem. Later came the
Dung-beetles of the pampas, the Phanæi, [48] some preparing, as
preserved foodstuff, cakes of Cow-dung modelled in the shape of a pear,
others sausage-meat kept fresh in clay jars. Both suggested the same
difficulty: can habits and industries which have no mutual connection
be explained as soon as we accept a common origin for these different
manufacturers, who moreover are so much alike in conformation? The
question crops up again, more urgently, with the four Rhynchites.
That the influence of environment may, to some extent, have caused
external modifications; that the light may have accentuated the
colouring; that the quantity of the food may have brought about some
small variation in size; that a warm or cold climate may have thinned
or thickened the fur: all these changes and many others besides I
willingly concede, if that will give any one any pleasure; but, for
pity’s sake, let us take higher ground than this, do not let us reduce
the world of the living to a collection of digestive tubes, an
assortment of bellies that fill and empty themselves.
Let us reflect upon the masterly touch that sets the whole animal
machine in motion; let us question the instincts, the controllers of
form; let us remember that glorious expression of the ancients, mens
agitat molem; and we shall understand the inextricable difficulty that
besets the theorists when they wish to explain how it is that of four
insects, as much alike in shape as so many drops of water, two roll
leaves, another carves fruit-stones, and the fourth profits by the pulp
of a rotten fruit.
If they are affiliated to one another, if they are indeed related, as
their so strongly-marked family-resemblance would seem to affirm, which
of them was the first of the line? Could it be the leaf-roller?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account