The life, trial and conversations of Robert Emmet, Esq., leader of the Irish insurrection of 1803 : $b also, the celebrated speech made by him on the occasionAnonymous
History
The life, trial and conversations of Robert Emmet, Esq., leader of the Irish insurrection of 1803 : $b also, the celebrated speech made by him on the occasion
At the instance of the attorney-general, Mr. O’Grady, Mr. Curran
accompanied him to the privy council. Upon his first entrance, there was
some indication of the hostile spirit which he had originally
apprehended. A noble lord, who at that time held the highest judicial
situation in Ireland, undertook to examine him upon the transaction
which occasioned his attendance. To do this was undoubtedly his duty. He
fixed his eye upon Mr. Curran, and was proceeding to cross-examine his
countenance, when (as it is well remembered by the spectators of the
scene) the swell of indignation, and the glance of stern dignity and
contempt which he encountered there, gave his own nerves the shock which
he had meditated for another’s, and compelled him to shrink back in his
chair, silent and disconcerted at the failure of his rash experiment.
With this single exception, Mr. Curran was treated with the utmost
delicacy.
A special commission was opened to try Emmet and nineteen other
prisoners in Dublin, on the thirty-first of August, 1803, under Lord
Norbury, Mr. Finucane, and Barons George and Daly. Mr. Standish O’Grady
was the attorney general.
Of these nineteen, one was acquitted, and another reprieved; the rest
were convicted and executed on the evidence of various witnesses.
Amongst the unfortunate men convicted were some of the principle
associates of Emmet in the insurrection. Mr. Russel was the son of an
officer of reputation in his majesty’s service, and who, having retired,
enjoyed an honourable retreat in the situation of master of the royal
hospital for veterans at Kilmainham, near Dublin. He was placed early in
the army, and served at Bunker’s Hill, and the subsequent campaigns in
North America. After the peace, he either retired on half pay, or his
corps was reduced. He was affectionate and tender-hearted, and possessed
every feeling and sentiment of the gentleman. After the arrest of Emmet,
Russel introduced himself clandestinely into Dublin, with a view to
rescue his friend, if possible, under favour of some commotion. About
two days after his arrival, it became known that some person was
mysteriously secreted in the immediate vicinity of the castle.
Information to this effect having been conveyed to Major Sirr, that
officer proceeded to the examination of a house in Parliament-street,
where he was found, and to whom Mr. Russel, though well armed,
surrendered without resistance. It was supposed that he was, in this
act, influenced by a religious scruple. He was immediately transmitted
to Down Patrick, in the north of Ireland, where he was shortly after
brought to trial, and upon the clearest evidence of his treason,
convicted.—After his trial, he manifested all that wildness of religious
enthusiasm, which had for some time formed the prominent feature of his
character. On conviction, he addressed the court at great length, and
with remarkable firmness. He declared his adherence to the political
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account