The life, trial and conversations of Robert Emmet, Esq., leader of the Irish insurrection of 1803 : $b also, the celebrated speech made by him on the occasionAnonymous
History
The life, trial and conversations of Robert Emmet, Esq., leader of the Irish insurrection of 1803 : $b also, the celebrated speech made by him on the occasion
There was a law of discovery, by which a man who betrayed the confidence
of his friend, if he were catholic, possessed himself of that friend’s
estate. There was a law which disabled the catholic father to be
guardian to his own child, or to educate him. There was a law which made
the disobedience or apostacy of the catholic child the means whereby to
disinherit his father. There was a law for robbing a catholic of his
horse on the highway, if, when interrogated, he confessed his faith.
There was a law to prevent the education of catholic children, and to
punish catholic teachers as convicts; to banish the catholic clergy, and
to hang them if they returned: to prevent catholics from purchasing or
inheriting landed estates: from having arms for their defence: to debar
them from the profession of the law: to prevent them from holding any
office of trust, honour or emolument, voting at elections, or sitting in
parliament.
The United Irishmen found their country under government of those laws,
and of perhaps a hundred more, all conceived in the same spirit, and all
elaborated with consummate skill to rob, harass, and insult a
defenceless people. Those statutes, without parallel for their
inhumanity, were framed against christians, under pretence of securing
the protestant religion. They were enacted by the Irish protestants,
political protestants, than whom no sect has cried more loudly against
persecution, when protestants were the martyrs. For all this the
protestant religion is not persecuting in its nature. The crimes of the
dominant party are not justly chargeable upon the protestant religion,
though committed in its name. They were bitterly deplored by the United
Irishmen of all religions, and by none more than the subject of this
memoir, himself a member of the established church, but no abettor of
its injustice.
Through all this long persecution, the conduct of England wore a vizor
of hypocrisy. It was not the conversion of the Irish it desired, but
their spoliation, division and subjection. If united in religion, they
might unite for their worldly interest, and a means of weakening them by
dissension would be lost. The English mission never had the merit of
even being honestly fanatical; it was cold-blooded and crafty. Its
conduct was not feebly palliated by the mistaken sincerity of blind
zeal, which time might soften and philosophy assuage. It had the more
terrestrial motives of insatiable rapacity, the appetite for plunder,
and the desire of battening on the green pastures of Ireland. This is
the eating canker which neither time nor reason ever cures, and which is
now as devouring, where it has the power, as at the first hour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account