Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ireland -- In literature
Other common words of Norse derivation are _traill_, a slave; _nabuidh_,
a neighbour; _sgillinn_, a penny; _mòd_, a court of justice, meeting;
_gadhar_, a greyhound; _toraisgean_, a peat knife, half Norse, half
Gaelic; _suith_, soot; _shearradair_, towel; _mal_, rent; _gleadhraich_,
noise.
The Vikings were called _sumarlidi_, “summer wanderers,” because they
were most abroad at that season, and from this came the name once famous
in the West—“Somerled” of the Isles. To the Norse is also attributed the
insertion of _t_ in words like _struth_ for _sruth_, _stron_ for _sron_.
V. But more important even than the introduction of new words was the
influence upon the structure of the language. And competent authorities
hold that to it we must assign the main share in accelerating the decay
of inflection noticeable in the Scottish Gaelic and Manx as compared
with the Irish. The latter was not so much exposed to Norse influence as
the former. And it is very apparent that the change referred to began to
assert itself soon after the Norse had ostracised the Irish, and taken
its place as a rival language in the West, destined to influence the
local Gaelic.
It is not contended that the Gaelic writers derived any help from the
Norsemen. They were themselves the more advanced of the two. On the
other hand, the Icelandic scholar Viglisson has traced Gaelic rhymes and
measures as well as Gaelic ideas in the old Norse literature, and
Professor Zimmer even suggests that the Icelander owes to the Gael his
prose style. In the Islendinga Book, c. 1., we read that when Iceland
was first settled from Norway in the days of Harold Fairhair there were
Christian men, whom the Norsemen called Papa, but who afterwards went
away because they would not remain with the heathen, and left behind
them Irish books and croziers and bells, from which it could be seen
that they were Irishmen.[26]
VI. How far the Norse ideas have entered into the warp and woof of
Gaelic literature is perhaps the most interesting aspect of the whole
subject, and one that offers a wide field for research. It cannot yet be
said that we have sufficiently differentiated between the two sets of
legends, beliefs, and customs to be able to affirm with certainty that
such and such belong to the one race, and such and such belong to the
other. The mythologies of peoples have so much in common, so much that
seems characteristic of the thinking of the whole human race at certain
stages of its development, that many ideas and legends have no exclusive
value, and cannot be claimed as the original heritage of one people more
than another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account