Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ireland -- In literature
The attitude of this early Celtic Church towards the original oral
traditions and compositions of the people was perfectly consistent, and
can be easily understood. It simply ignored them as far as that was
possible, offering in their stead a substitute infinitely better fitted,
as it thought, to elevate the life and character of these pagan peoples.
With a zeal that is entirely praiseworthy, it set itself to the
multiplication of copies of the Psalter, of the Gospels, and other parts
of Scripture. It is really marvellous, when we consider that these had
to be patiently and laboriously and beautifully handwritten, how much
was accomplished in this way by the early missionaries. St. Columba
alone was credited with having written “three hundred gifted, lasting,
illuminated, noble books,” all of them transcriptions of some portions
of the Bible, no doubt.
It is this which accounts for the fact that almost all the existing
literary monuments of the early Celtic Church are copies of the Gospels
or of the Psalter, with or without Gaelic or Latin glosses.
Thus the “Domhnach Airgid,” the “Cathrach,” the Books of Durrow, Dimna,
Kells, Molling, Armagh, Deer, the “Gospel of Maeielbrid Macdurnain,” the
“Psalter of Southampton,” with correlative books like the “Irish Canons”
and “Missal of Stowe,” in the British Islands, besides those on the
Continent.
It is significant that the missionaries used the Latin versions of the
Scriptures rather than Greek or Hebrew ones, with the reading and
writing of which latter they seemed to have been less familiar. They did
not attempt, so far as we know, to make a Gaelic translation of the
original, but contented themselves, no doubt, with rendering from Latin
into the Gaelic in course of their preachings and expositions.
One thing is evident, that these scholarly men had no aversion to
textual criticism or any fear of it, like so many of their Highland and
Irish successors to-day, for they freely indulged in it for their own
and the popular benefit. Thus the Celtic Church of Scotland and Ireland
had Jerome’s recension of the Vulgate almost as soon as it was issued,
and, to judge from the youthful Columba and his master St. Finnian’s
avidity for it, welcomed it with great enthusiasm. And more than that,
the Celtic Church appears to have collated Jerome’s text with older
native texts of their own, to make if possible even a better version,
such as they might use in all their monasteries, and such as we find to
this day in most of their great books of Gospel, as quoted above.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account