Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ireland -- In literature
Having thus glanced briefly at the representatives of the older
scholarship and their work, we shall now have occasion to retrace our
steps to consider the representatives of the new critical and
philological movement. After Edward Lhuyd’s demise no further progress
seems to have been registered in the elucidation of Celtic philology
till the time of Franz Bopp. Even as late as the first quarter of the
nineteenth century, Gaelic was regarded by scholars as a peculiar
language, unconnected with the other European tongues. It is true that
Sir William Jones, from his study of Sanskrit, had thrown out the hint
as early as 1786, that Celtic was of the same original stock with the
other languages of Europe and South-Western Asia; but when Bopp first
published his _Comparative Grammar_ Celtic was omitted. It was Dr.
Pritchard, an English ethnologist, who, in 1832, really demonstrated on
the lines laid down by Grimm and Bopp, that the Celtic language is a
member of the Indo-European group.
His book, entitled _The Eastern Origin of the Celtic Nations_, from this
time drew the attention of continental scholars to the excluded and
hitherto neglected language, with the result that three important works
soon after appeared, namely, first, one _On the Affinity of the Celtic
Languages with the Sanskrit_, by Adolph Pictet (Paris, 1837); second,
the _Die Celtischen Sprachen_, or _Celtic Philology_, by Bopp (Berlin,
1839); and the _Celtica_ of Dr. Diefenbach (Stuttgart, 1839–40).
By this time Bopp had studied the Celtic dialects, and published the
above work as a supplement to his great _Comparative Grammar of the
Sanskrit, Zend, Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, Gothic, German, and Sclavonic
Languages_. Some features of Gaelic phonetics, such as initial
aspiration and ellipsis, taking the place of declension, seems hitherto
to have baffled scholars, but Bopp’s sagacity enabled him to perceive
that these are nothing else than the relics and results of the
after-action of the old case-endings, and that the rational explanation
is to be found in the final sound of the previous word, or, as we now
say, vocalic and nasal auslaut. This discovery has since been fully
confirmed by Zeuss, Ebel, and Windisch.
It was with the publication of the _Grammatica Celtica_, however, that
the great moment in the evolution of Celtic scholarship arrived. Its
gifted author, J. Caspard Zeuss, stands supreme as the real founder of
Celtic philology. He did for it what Grimm did for the Teutonic, and
Diez for the Romance. Since the appearance of his monumental work it has
been definitely settled that the Celtic languages are pure Indo-European
tongues, without any admixture of foreign elements, and thus that they
are members of the family in the same sense that Latin or Gothic is. In
addition, it has furnished the means of interpreting the most ancient
forms of the Gaelic language found in the very old MSS., which before
then had defied the efforts of translators.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account