Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ireland -- In literature
Of the “Confession,” the style and gist may be gathered from the
extracts given as we recounted his life. It is perhaps the earliest
piece of authentic Celtic literature we have, inasmuch as it is the
first of which the authorship can be definitely and historically
asserted. Its Latin is rude and archaic, answering to the description
St. Patrick gives of his own writing. It quotes from the pre-Vulgate
version of the Scriptures, and contains nothing inconsistent with the
period in which it professes to have been written.
The saint appears to have penned this document as a kind of defence of
his apostolic work against the attacks of men who regarded the whole
undertaking as arrogant and presumptuous in view of his own rusticity.
“The rustic condition was created by the Most High,” he gently reminds
them, and adds some plain truths which show that, like Jesus, and St.
Paul, and St Francis of Assisi, and other great master-spirits of the
Christian Evangel, he did not disdain poverty, but voluntarily assumed
it for the promotion of the Gospel. It would be tedious, he says, to
relate even a portion of the many toils and dangers he had gone through.
Twelve times his life was in imminent peril. Never one farthing did he
receive for all his preaching and teaching. He challenges his detractors
to say if he did and it will be returned. The people, indeed, were
generous and offered innumerable gifts, which, out of principle, he
refused, lest it might furnish an opportunity for cavil against the
disinterestedness of his mission. On one occasion, on being told that
his own nephew declared that his preaching would be perfect if he
insisted a little more on the necessity of giving, he gave the noble
reply, that “for the sake of charity he forebore to preach charity.”
The “Epistle to Coroticus” is evidently from the same pen. The Latin and
the literary style are similar. It also quotes from the pre-Vulgate
version, and there is no internal evidence against the assumption that
it was written by the saint. Though not found in the Book of Armagh, it
is preserved in the other MSS. cited, some of which may be as old as the
eleventh and twelfth centuries.
Certain authorities identify Coroticus with the Welsh prince Caredig.
Other more recent scholars, such as Drs. Skene, Whitley Stokes, and
Douglas Hyde, contend that he was a prince of Strathclyde, Ceretic by
name, who had his capital at Alclwyd, the modern Dumbarton, and thus
that he hailed from St. Patrick’s own district.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account