The literature of the Highlanders : $b a history of Gaelic literature from the earliest times to the present dayMacNeill, Nigel
History
The literature of the Highlanders : $b a history of Gaelic literature from the earliest times to the present day
MacNeill, Nigel
Scottish Gaelic literature -- History and criticism
16. _Mr Archibald MacNeill, W.S._, with his brothers Lord Colonsay
and Sir John MacNeill, who were all familiar with the Gaelic
language, firmly believed that the Gaelic text of Macpherson belonged
to the early centuries of the Christian era. Mr MacNeill published
his views in a small volume in which legal acumen is brought to
bear on the question, and which concludes as follows: “At what date
Ossian lived we do not pretend to determine; but this, at least, is
sufficiently clear, that the Gaelic Ossian was not the production of
Macpherson or any author of modern times, but must be referred to
a period of remote antiquity. It further appears from the internal
evidence of these poems, that they refer to a period prior to the
diffusion of Christianity and the era of clanship.” Of course
Macpherson was clever enough, granting he elected to do so, to give a
complexion of antiquity to his compositions.
17. My own opinion of the question I embody in the following
propositions. I began the study of Macpherson’s Ossian some twelve
years ago, and exercised myself then in translating many portions of
it, so I am fairly familiar with it.
I believe—
(1.) That the English is a translation from Gaelic, probably from a
ruder version than that published in 1807.
(2.) That Macpherson is neither absolutely the author, nor merely the
translator, of the poems connected with his name.
(3.) That he formed his original Gaelic by joining and recasting old
ballads, that he connected these ballads by paragraphs of his own
composition, and that the newly-written recast matter constitutes
the chief parts of the epics which he had thus formed, but in which,
however, the spirit of the old productions still survives.
(4.) That the Gaelic is far more elaborate than the English, is
subtler in conception, less concrete in expression, and has been
likely, before the text was finally published, the subject of many
alterations and improvements.
(5.) That on the whole the language of the text of 1807 is not, as
some allege, essentially different from that of the ballads that are
known to be genuine.
(6.) That the metre of the Gaelic text is not more irregular than
that of these same ballads, the chief difference being that while
the latter are mostly made up of either trochees or iambs the former
frequently mixes anapaests with trochees or iambs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account