The literature of the Highlanders : $b a history of Gaelic literature from the earliest times to the present dayMacNeill, Nigel
History
The literature of the Highlanders : $b a history of Gaelic literature from the earliest times to the present day
MacNeill, Nigel
Scottish Gaelic literature -- History and criticism
There is one phase of the history of those early centuries, which
he who runs may read now, and in which the Highland people are
naturally very much interested. It has come distinctly into view as
the result of able discussions during the last ten years. The Celtic
period of our national history used to receive very scant attention
indeed at the hands of the recognised writers on such subjects.
Our latest historians have shown a spirit of greater fairness. The
first volume of Burton’s “History of Scotland” may be said to be
devoted to the Celtic period; and, with the exception of the writer’s
evident anxiety to find the paternity of the higher influences
of civilisation in Teutonic fields, may be regarded as a fair
representation of the events of the centuries described. Even the
publication of such a work as Skene’s “Celtic Scotland,” bearing so
suggestive a title, is a fact of much significance. A learned if not
always discriminating volume, “Celtic Ireland,” by Dr Sophie Bryant,
has also just been published.
In the fifth and sixth centuries we are confronted with a group of
races in north Britain which have formed the subject of bitter and
exhaustive controversies. The terms “Pict” and “Scot” are the chief
monuments of this fierce warfare. No one can pretend to say now
who the races are of whom these terms are the exponents. They were
bestowed on the people by outsiders, and are quite unknown in the
native literature of the country. It is highly probable that they
indicate personal characteristics such as dress rather than race.
The clans or tribes to whom they were applied have been found all
over north Britain and the north of Ireland at different times. To
translate them into native terms will only make the confusion already
existing more hopeless. To render _Pict_ by “Cruthnec” would be as
inaccurate as to render _Scot_ by “Gàidheal.” The most helpful way in
which we can arrive at a fairly satisfactory conclusion at present is
to take a brief survey of the various races from a Gaelic standpoint;
keeping the main results of ethnological inquiry before our minds.
From this position the use of the terms “Pict” and “Scot” must be
altogether discarded. Let us examine the terms which the Gaelic
language supplies:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account