The Little Cryptogram: A Literal Application to the Play of Hamlet of the Cipher System of Mr. Ignatius Donnelly.Pyle, Joseph Gilpin
General
The Little Cryptogram: A Literal Application to the Play of Hamlet of the Cipher System of Mr. Ignatius Donnelly.
Pyle, Joseph Gilpin
Donnelly, Ignatius, 1831-1901. Great cryptogram; Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Authorship -- Baconian theory
Acting upon this clue, search is made for the next interpolation. It is
found but three pages further on, in the absurd grave-diggers’ scene.
This is preceded by the direction, “Enter two clowns.” Now clowns do not
dig graves, and grave-diggers are not generally clowns. It was clearly
the intention of the writer to call special attention to the following
lines. And the passage itself contains matter which is more ridiculous
than anything in Ophelia’s crazy words: “If the man go to the water and
drown himself, it is will he nill he, he goes; mark you that; but if the
water come to him and drown him, he drowns not himself.” What rot is
this which the great Bacon utters? There is a rat behind this arras. But
how to get at him! We turn for help to the cryptogram. We find, on page
555 of that volume, the account of Mr. Donnelly’s first discovery. He
noted the word “Bacon,” on page 53 of I “Henry IV.” He counted the
number of italicized words in the first column of that page and found it
to be 7; multiplied that number by the page number, and found the
product 371; and, lo! the 371st word was “Bacon.” We go back to the
grave-diggers. On the page where they are voicing idiocy, there are six
italicized words in the first column. The number of the page is 276.
Divide 276 by 6, and the quotient is 46. Count upward from the bottom of
the second column, and the 46th word is “nill he,” so printed for
concealment. This phrase, “will he nill he,” occurs nowhere else in the
plays. It is here for a purpose. The mad song gave “Don.” The graveyard
scene gives, by Mr. Donnelly’s process, closely followed, “nill he.”
“Don nill he;” “Donnelly.” Eureka! we are on the trail of the mystery,
and the cipher has been at work here. There must be more behind.
Now, lest anyone should entertain the injurious and erroneous suspicion
that this is mere burlesque let it be stated here that what has
preceded, and what follows is the result, in every instance, of accurate
mathematical work. A few of the Donnelly numbers, and the numbers of
pages and of words on a page were used, and no others. The cipher
employed is the Donnelly cipher. The words on every page, the italicized
words, the bracketed words and the hyphenated words were counted
separately and numbered. The edition used is the fac-simile reproduction
of the 1623 folio. Every computation has been carefully made. And if any
reader doubts, he is requested to procure a copy of the reprint, make
the count and verify the figures for himself, and prove to himself that
the cipher discovery which follows is as literally worked out, as
credible, as truly the work of Lord Bacon as anything to be found from
cover to cover of “The Great Cryptogram.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account