The Little Review, April 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 2)Various
General
The Little Review, April 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 2)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
And “At the end of the Road”—by faith and a study of the signs—he
proclaimed the New Jerusalem for America, particularly for his
home-village.... Now, there is a peculiar value attached to this
journey—the influence on the poet, not the preacher’s influence on the
people. It was after this trip that we got _The Santa Fé Trail_, _The
Fireman’s Ball_, written in a style in which were later written _The
Chinese Nightingale_ and _The Congo_. And, because of the relation of
its style to these, we even judge _I heard Emmanuel Singing_ a good
thing. This, then, is Lindsay’s importance among us; his contribution of
this style of vaudeville chanting. This is the poet. He does not count
when writing _Galahad_, _Knight Who Perished_, _King Arthur’s Men Have
Come Again_, _Incense_, _Springfield Magical_, or declaring “by faith
and a study of the signs.”
III.
On November first, 1915, at Springfield, Illinois, Vachel Lindsay signed
a book on _The Art of the Moving Picture_. The last chapter was called
“The Acceptable Year of the Lord.” From having seen forecastings in
photoplay hieroglyphics the children in times-to-come can rise and say:
“This day is the scripture fulfilled in your ears”:
Scenario writers, producers, photoplay actors, endowers of
exquisite films, sects using special motion pictures for a
predetermined end, all you who are taking the work as a sacred
trust, I bid you God-speed. Consider what it will do to your
souls, if you are true to your trust.... The record of your
ripeness will be found in your craftsmanship. You will be God’s
thoroughbreds.
It has come then, this new weapon of men, and the face of the
whole earth changes. In after centuries its beginning will be
indeed remembered.
It has come, this new weapon of men, and by faith and a study of
the signs we proclaim that it will go on and on in immemorial
wonder.
This, then, is the prophecy, and thus has he proclaimed it: “By my
hypothesis, Action Pictures are sculpture-in-motion, Intimate
Pictures are paintings-in-motion, Splendour Pictures are
architecture-in-motion.... The rest of the work is a series of after
thoughts and speculations not brought forward so dogmatically.”
Now, the Arts are complete in themselves; they contain all. The moving
picture has come to be a parasite on them.
Sculpture has become a vital thing to this age because of August Rodin.
Meunier has moved us too. Also Monolo and Fagi. Now comes Lindsay: “I
desire for the moving picture not the stillness but the majesty of
sculpture.... Not the mood of Venus de Milo, but let us turn to that
sister of hers—the great Victory of Samothrace”.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account