The Little Review, April 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 2)Various
General
The Little Review, April 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 2)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Why should not vibrant life assert itself after its kind, even in the
presence of death? What desecration was there in this man and woman
coming together in such presence, drawn by the invincible magnetism of
sex? What of falsity to life was there in the lawyer’s giving and
answering the call of life as to this woman, even though he had a wife
whom he loved?
Why conjure up an atmosphere of guilt that neither man nor woman felt?
Why suggest such hair-bristling horror as to the accidental overturning
of a dead man’s body, any more than over the accidental upsetting of a
vase, or a statue, in the course of a dance? Why such strained effort to
make that specialized expression of vibrant life which is the very
pivotal centre of all life appear as the degradation of degradation,
degrading everything else, even death?
Will you answer that there is an eternal and universal sense of the
fitness of things with which every soul may be lightened that cometh
into the world? Shall I not reply to you that this is a lie against
life—that life is sacrificed every day to this lie? Shall I not say to
you that vibrant life must not allow itself to be sacrificed to such
lies—that vibrant life must create anew continually a sense of the
fitness of things for itself and for its every new expression—that it
must do this with authority, shaking itself bravely free from the clutch
of the dead hand, whether as to traditions, standards, customs, morals,
ideals or love even? Shall I not say to you that Life must assert its
right to Live? Shall we not organize life on such basis?
REVIEWING “THE LITTLE REVIEW”
_Virginia York in “The Richmond Evening Journal”_:
As we said a couple of months ago, THE LITTLE REVIEW, published in windy
Chicago, is claimed by its editors and readers to be the very, very last
word in prose and poetry. Also, it is the organ, the mouth organ,
perhaps, of that unsustained tune known as “vers libre.” In a criticism
of some of the Review’s lurid, foolish contents we poked a good deal of
fun at the publication in general and one piece of loose, or free, verse
in particular. This gem, entitled, “Cafe Sketches,” by Arthur Davison
Ficke, said, in part:
Presently persons will come out
And shake legs.
I do not want legs shaken.
I want immortal souls shaken unreasonably.
I want to see dawn spilled across the blackness
Like a scrambled egg on a skillet;
I want miracles, wonders.
Tidings out of deeps I do not know, ...
But I have a horrible suspicion
That neither you
Nor your esteemed consort
Nor I myself
Can ever provide these simple things
For which I am so patiently waiting
Base people.
How I dislike you!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account