The Little Review, April 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, April 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Now, please, all you people who put us down as æsthetes or shallow
cultists or youth rebelling for the sake of sensation, or tiresome
upholders of art “principles,” or sapless supporters of art as a “hole
and corner” affair—please for a moment, just listen. If you get enraged
with the censorship of the vicious Mr. Sumner every one knows it is not
because you wish to flaunt your theories of good literature to the
heavens for the want of something better to do. Very well. Grant me the
same sincerity. And grant me also another thing: that I may possibly
have something true to say.
I have waited five years to see Isadora Duncan. I went to the
Metropolitan expecting to see the Dionysian, “the feet of the Centaur
trampling the stage,” etc. I expected inspiration in a form that you are
lucky enough to experience a very few times in your life. Everybody had
talked to me this way about Isadora Duncan; every poet, painter,
sculptor and musician, every radical I know, had said, “She has real
greatness.” Well, this is what I saw:
Isadora Duncan ran and jumped and skipped and stamped and swooned about
the stage, dragging with her a body that was never meant to move in
rhythmic line, turning music into stories of war and religion,
illustrating the stories with obvious gesticulations toward the heavens
or maudlin manoeuverings towards the grave, using the same gestures for
the sweetness of Schubert as for the sacraments of César Franck, moving
always _inside_ the music, never dominating it, never even controlling
it, never holding or pushing it to an authentic end. In all my life I
have never felt such disappointment or such a weary knowledge of the
public’s predilection for what is truly bad. It didn’t occur to me to
conceal these ideas. I tried to explain what was wrong. I used Isadora
Duncan as the best example I knew of the differentiation between the
artist and the pseudo-artist. I tried to show how her conception of Art
was identical with only one other conception in the world: the dream of
the adolescent brain: that to feel greatly is to make Art and to put
your passion and your anguish into expression is to create. Isadora felt
a great deal. She shook her head and arms in such a fury of feeling that
she appeared to be strangling; and when there was no way of reaching a
further intensification she shook her whole body in a kind of spasm of
human inability to bear the grief of the world. And every move was a
futile and pitiable one because never once did her body become that
mould through which a design is to shape its course and flow into its
ultimate form. If the music made a wide swinging curve she made a
cramped sudden curve; if it made a descending line she interpreted that,
for some mysterious reason, by reverently clutching her abdomen and
looking to God.
“Oh,” they say, “you are talking about technique.”
No, no, no! I am not talking about technique. I am almost never talking
technique.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account