The Little Review, August 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 5)Various
General
The Little Review, August 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 5)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Good and evil, these are time-old opposites. So are beautiful and ugly.
But these two opposites are seldom entirely coincident. No doubt there
are good and high-class men who are commonly judged to be fundamentally
ugly. And there are blinding beauties who are on a war-footing against
all that we call good. The good satisfies our moral judgment; the
beautiful, our judgment of taste. The one has to do with the content of
human life; the other, with the form. But, at bottom, the moral judgment
and the judgment of taste cannot remain entirely and materially
dissociated. It was a more nearly correct feeling on the part of the
Greeks when they let the beautiful and the good inter-grow. According to
the Greek, the good and the beautiful, intimately united, constitute the
ideal of virtue, however. We are reconciled after a fashion to the
ugliness of a man if we find a great and noble soul in the repellant
shell.
But if permanent beauty is to be preserved to human nature, efficient
and high endeavor, free self-concentrated formation of character is the
only means to this end. When the “outer man” mirrors goodness and beauty
of heart, firmness and bravery of will, seriousness and depth of
thought, his countenance glows under all circumstances with a radiance
of happy beauty, and it would be a barbarian and pitiable eye indeed
that could not apprehend such radiance or feel itself smitten with its
glory. For the man of fine feeling, therefore, all that is ugly affects
him morally at the same time. Indeed, the reproach of having behaved in
an ugly manner he feels as keenly, frequently more keenly in fact, than
the reproach of having behaved immorally.
In the case of _Friedrich Nietzsche_, the moral criterion of human worth
was totally transformed into an aesthetic criterion! This man who had
subdued all “morality” and left it behind him, who took his stand
“beyond good and evil,” submitted to a new evaluation, was measured
according to his greatness. Greatness was nobility, supremacy, beauty.
Smallness was vulgarity, baseness, ugliness. Not the wickedest, and not
the wretchedest, but the ugliest man—_der hässlichste Mensch_—represents
the power which the new culture has to struggle with—to overcome,
indeed—if man is to mount to a higher plane of being.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account