The Little Review, December 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 9)Various
General
The Little Review, December 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 9)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
I remember, in a discussion on art the other evening, your crying out
about “the eternal standard” and I feeling it was true but not knowing
what it meant. I know now. It meant nothing. It is just another fancy.
Vive la divinité!
Remember what Homo Sapiens discovered: the limitations of the
infinite—of his brain. They are as nothing to the limitations of our
Gods.
_GOD’S GARDEN—THE WORLD_
(_Yes, this still happens. We get hordes of such letters._)
I feel sure that at heart your idea of freedom is right, but I do not
believe that you altogether understand how to carry it out.
To get at the bottom of things—you want to be just a natural, normal
human being. You want to live, to grow, to expand like a flower. How
then is this most easily accomplished? Simply this, to be what nature or
God or the power back of the universe intended for you to be. What then
is your place in the universe, and what is your relation to it? You are
by God’s grace a woman; then the greatest thing you can do is to be a
woman. But what does it mean to be a woman? To love, to create, to
protect, to uplift, and to purify. What do these words mean? You can
love the out-of-doors, you can love books, music, art, people, all the
world, everything your heart desires. All that you love you can create
by writing, by making things grow, by building and constructing. You can
protect by being a mother to all those weaker than yourself who need
your help. You can uplift and purify by inspiring all you meet with
goodness and high ideals.
Yes, you say, but how can I be free to do these things when I am
hampered and bound by conventionalities and surroundings? No one is
bound down who knows that freedom comes from within, not from without.
The girl in the factory, the girl in college, the girl in her own home,
or the girl out of doors can be just as free as she makes up her mind to
be. Freedom is not a matter of clothes or environment.
As to conventionalities—most of them have been formed because time and
culture have taught us to have regard for our fellow beings. There is
nothing immorally wrong in a man going to the opera in his shirt sleeves
but it might not be agreeable to the gentleman seated next to him. Then
the psychology of the close relationship between thoughts and
actions—free thoughts result in free actions, likewise carelessness in
our habits of daily life make careless thinking. I believe in keeping
your own individuality above all things if you can back up your ideas by
good reasons; but you will find that there is a reason for most
conventionalities that can’t be overthrown. If we were not an integral
part of a whole we could do just as we pleased because no one would be
affected and no one would care; but everything we do, every move we
make, affects some part of the whole, and that is why we care and why
everybody cares.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account