The Little Review, January-February 1916 (Vol. 2, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, January-February 1916 (Vol. 2, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
_Woods Dargan, Darlington, S. C._:
I enclose a check for $1.50, and ask that you enter my name for one
year’s subscription—that is, if you will let one of the rabble creep in.
Frankly, I know no more about art (with a capital A or otherwise) than a
rabbit. I don’t even know what an “Imagist” is! And for the life of me I
cannot understand why the temperamental, fussy gentleman named Alexander
S. Kaun should not use a singular verb with a singular noun, just like
ordinary people. But when he says, as he does in the first line of the
fourth paragraph of his article, “the dearer a person or a thing _are_
to me, etc.,” I know there must be intellectual purpose in it, some
esoteric effect that gets to the cultured few but passes over my head;
so I bow before the unknown beauty of it, thinking, “Odd, but no doubt
it’s all right.”
Also, to my untutored mind, the frequent use of profanity in an
everyday, conversational way in two or three of the articles is amusing,
and makes me wonder. It reminds me of the days when I first took up the
art, and used to feel a shudder of delight when I ripped out a good,
mouth-filling, “Damn it all to hell!” Perhaps it has lost its charm for
me as a literary ornament because I swear so much myself, just as a
matter of habit without deriving the oldtime pleasure from it.
Other places where these boys put it all over me are in music and
Russians. It is one of my secret sorrows that I know I know nothing
about music. I like it, but it never occurs to me to fade away and fill
an early grave if I hear somebody’s nocturne murdered—that is, if I know
it is being murdered, which is highly unlikely. And as to the Russians,
old Dostoevsky is my limit so far, but I’m game, and am going in for all
the others,—the more gloomy and morbid the better.
Then, there’s this Mr. Theodore Dreiser. As we say in this neck of the
woods, in our uncouth manner, “He must be a bear-cat.” (By the way, I’d
give a lot to know what “demiurge” means in the sense in which it is
applied to him. Mr. Masters used it in _The New York Times_ some weeks
ago, and now I find it again in Mr. Powys’ appreciation. I don’t know
what they mean.) Well, I’ve had his book, _The “Genius,”_ for sometime,
and mean to read it all as soon as I can get round to it. Perhaps I’ll
know what “demiurge” means then—but I doubt it.
For all that I have said I would not have you think that I am wholly
lacking in soul. I have some things in common with these fellows, for I
have no religion or morals, and I enjoy getting drunk, riotously,
gloriously drunk, once or twice a year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account