The Little Review, January-February 1916 (Vol. 2, No. 10)Various
General
The Little Review, January-February 1916 (Vol. 2, No. 10)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
When I talk of the “new music”—which will be different from Debussy and
Schönberg and all the rest of them—I am not talking of how far beyond
the limits of known harmony, or the anarchy which disregards any
harmonic system, we shall go. Undoubtedly, as far as all that is
concerned, “some day some one will dig down to the roots and turn up
music as it is before it is tamed to the scale.” This seems to me a
settled fact. But I am much more interested in the piano itself and the
deliverer who is to set it free from the lie which has grown up around
it and make it vibrate to a truer color. It is all in the plane of
vibration, I believe. It will come about in three ways: through the
mechanical development of the piano, through a new type of music, and
chiefly through the new type of pianist.
You will have your Mason and Hamlin—(this is not advertising; it is
merely a conviction)—you will have that great dark-winged-victory
standing alone on a stage; you will care a great deal about the color of
the light around and above it—the tones of the walls within which your
beautiful sounds are to live; you will touch that ivory and ebony—oh,
there are no words! You will _see_ those sounds against the color....
You may write a program for your audience—something like this:
I believe the right technical approach is simply a different are
the most beautiful there are anywhere in the world—more beautiful
than the wind in trees or the moan in the sea or the silence that
is heard on deserts;
I believe that these sounds live only by a certain magic of
invocation. There are no rules for them—unless perhaps you want
to read Bergson.
I believe the right technical approach is simply a different kind
of friendship—or love affair—with each sound.
I believe that tone goes way beyond the range between pianissimo
and fortissimo, between legato and staccato, etc. Tone is
radiance, eagerness, light, darkness, devastation, something that
melts, something that cries and burns, something that shatters.
I do not believe in playing “programs”—ending with a blaze of
Liszt. I couldn’t play the _Campanella_ to save my life, but I
don’t see that it matters.
I do not believe in “program” music—beginning with Bach (now that
the public has learned to applaud him) and ending with Liszt. I
couldn’t play the _Campenella_ to save my life, but I don’t see
that it matters.
I do not believe in nature music—babbling brooks and warbling
birds. I believe in nature mood, just as I do in the mood of all
great phenomena.
The music I have made will be sometimes merely the curve of a
mood—like the curve of line in Watts’s _Orpheus and Eurydice_; or
merely the design of a color or a scent. But always it will keep
close to two fundamentals: that “hard gemlike flame” and the
rhythm of sex.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account