The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)Various
General
The Little Review, July 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 5)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Now Mr. Place, senior, would be described by many as a bad
father; and I do not contend that he was a conspicuously good
one. But as compared with the conventionally good father who
deliberately imposes himself on his son as god; who takes
advantage of childish credulity and parent worship to persuade
his son that what he approves of is right and what he disapproves
of is wrong; who imposes a corresponding conduct on the child by
a system of prohibitions and penalties, rewards and eulogies, for
which he claims divine sanction; compared to this sort of
abortionist and monster maker, I say, Place appears almost as a
Providence.
A gentleman once wrote to me and said, with an obvious conviction
that he was being most reasonable and high minded, that the only
thing he beat his children for was failure in perfect obedience
and perfect truthfulness. On these attributes, he said, he must
insist. As one of them is not a virtue at all, and the other is
the attribute of a god, one can imagine what the lives of this
gentleman's children would have been if it had been possible for
him to live down to his monstrous and foolish pretensions.
The cruelty (of beating a child) must be whitewashed by a moral
excuse, and a pretense of reluctance. It must be for the child's
good. The assailant must say "This hurts me more than it hurts
you." There must be hypocrisy as well as cruelty.
The most excusable parents are those who try to correct their own
faults in their offspring. The parent who says to his child: "I
am one of the successes of the Almighty: therefore imitate me in
every particular or I will have the skin off your back" (a quite
common attitude) is a much more absurd figure than the man who,
with a pipe in his mouth, thrashes his boy for smoking.
If you must hold yourself up to your children as an object lesson
(which is not at all necessary), hold yourself up as a warning
and not as an example. But you had much better let the child's
character alone. If you once allow yourself to regard a child as
so much material for you to manufacture into any shape that
happens to suit your fancy you are defeating the experiment of
the Life Force. You are assuming that the child does not know its
own business, and that you do. In this you are sure to be wrong.
The child feels the drive of the Life Force (often called the
Will of God); and you cannot feel it for him.
Most children can be, and many are, hopelessly warped and wasted
by parents who are ignorant and silly enough to suppose that they
know what a human being ought to be, and who stick at nothing in
their determination to force their children into their moulds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account