The Little Review, June 1917 (Vol. 4, No. 2)Various
General
The Little Review, June 1917 (Vol. 4, No. 2)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
His rallying cry to _The Egoist_ stirs my egoist soul to its depth. Ever
since I have known this journal I have felt it to be the finest, freest,
frankest, bravest avenue of expression in English ever opened to the
creative literary mind, in all its variety of faculty, without having
the least bias or prejudice as to any one variety. That _The Little
Review_ should respond to this rallying cry would add a still deeper and
stronger point to my already deep and strong interest in this brave
little (?) magazine.
Fear Not
Mrs. O. D. J.:
I have great faith in the artistic life of America and I don’t think
Ezra Pound’s notions of it are very healthy. I sincerely hope the trend
of it will not emulate the “smart” or dissipated literature which seems
to please London and which can hardly come under the head of “good
letters.” America must not necessarily be content with jejune flows of
words. Really the only half interesting articles that appeared in the
May number were Eliot’s and Pound’s—the former because it was about as
good as _The Smart Set_ and the latter on account of auld lang syne. My
harshness is really flattering because it shows that I expect better
things from the “cultured” English.
[We will take this opportunity of answering all those who have verbally
or in letters expressed the fear that _The Little Review_ will entirely
change its nature and be influenced in the future by its Foreign Editor.
I do not want to be flippant, but indeed little faith is shown in us by
all those who have known our struggle to be what we believe, and our
financial struggle to be at all. Fear not, dear ones. We have learned to
be penny wise; we will not be Pound foolish. We agree with Pound in the
spirit; if we don’t always agree with him in the letter be sure we will
mention it. And Pound didn’t slip up on us unaware. A mutual misery over
the situation brought us together.
And you, dear Mrs. O. D. J., what made you think that Ezra Pound and T.
S. Eliot were “cultured” English? Because geese are white and float upon
water they are not necessarily swans. Pound too seems to have enough
faith in “good letters” to spare a little for America and share
“cultured” English with her. Healthy? The unhealth is in the artistic
life of America; and whatever the ailment, bitter and acid medicine
seems necessary to cure it. America must not be content for a great
while with the stuff produced here—jejune flows of words about
popularizing art, home-town poets and great American novelists, and
never-been-abroad painters. This seems to content it well enough now.
But I congratulate you on being able to read _The Smart Set_ as
literature. Maybe the audience will after all produce the art. I
wonder....]
A Poet’s Opinion
Maxwell Bodenheim, New York:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account