The Little Review, June-July 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 4) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, June-July 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 4)Various
General
The Little Review, June-July 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 4)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
I am sick of their kinsmen, of the surgical tongues who dissect, who
vivisect and auto-sect.
I am sick most of all of my own talk. But I continue to talk. I talk out
of boredom and manage only to increase it. I talk out of vanity and
spread disillusionment. I talk out of love and have to apologize. A
victim of habit, I continue speaking, although I know the spoken word is
the true medium of misunderstanding. Words, words, they keep tumbling
out of my mouth and blowing away like dust before the wind. A pock on
them.
There have been revolutions in literature, authors have changed the size
and construction of the novel, publishers have changed the color of
their bindings, poets have changed the form of their poetry and the
essence of its style, thinkers even have altered slightly the trend of
their thought. Music, painting, decorating, carving—everything changes
with time except talk, which only increases. What a staggering
illustration of the theory that it is only the weak things which
survive. For talk is the commonest of weaknesses. Blaa, blaa, blaa—why
not a revolution? What ails the radicals? Do they not realize that the
time is ripe? They have changed the moral forms, the literary forms, why
not the spoken forms? Why not a substitution of expressive grunts and
whoops and growls and chuckles and groans and gurgles and whees and
wows? Or is this matter one not for the radical but for
“The Scavenger.”
The Nine!—Exhibit!
Sometime in the winter a rumor got about that nine artists of Chicago
were to form themselves into a group and hold an independent exhibition.
At once the other artists were divided into two factions, those who
jeered and those who applauded, those who said unpleasant things and
those who had the enduring hope that at last something better was to be
done in our exhibitions.
The Great Nine, as the group began to be called—whether by themselves or
by others, it matters not: the phrase is a handicap—consists of Frederic
C. Bartlett, William Penhallow Henderson, Lawton Parker, Karl Albert
Buehr, Louis Betts, Charles Francis Browne, Ralph Clarkson, Wilson
Irvine, and Oliver Dennett Grover. They were too generous in their
number. Five, and there would have been no comment; nine, and there was
aroused indignation, criticism, and a “show us” spirit which should have
put the Nine on their mettle and made them give a stunning and silencing
show.
On May thirteenth, after one postponement when expectation was tense,
the exhibition opened. What had we? A new setting and old stuff!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account