The Little Review, March 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 1) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, March 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 1)Various
General
The Little Review, March 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 1)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
To resort to the most overworked phrase in the language, Paderewski has
a temperament. Somebody has said that no fat person ever possessed one;
and after you've speculated about this till you begin to wonder what
temperament really is, you can come back to Paderewski as the most
adequate illustration. Ysaye is the best example I know of the opposite.
When strength turns to fat ... well, we'll not go into that; but to make
my point--and there's certainly nothing of personal maliciousness in
it--it's necessary to reflect that obesity has some insidious influence
upon artistic utterance. (Schumann-Heink is an artist in the best
meaning of the word; but no one ever talked of her and temperament in
the same breath, so she doesn't negate the issue.) But Ysaye's tepid,
wingless, uninspired music--his utterly sweet but _fat_ music--that
appears to attract thousands of people, is as lazily inadequate as its
creator would be in a marathon. It's as though his vision had dropped
slowly away with every added pound of avoirdupois. Or perhaps it's
because vision has a fashion of dropping away with age....
Ah!--but Paderewski has the years, too, now, and his playing is
as virile, as flaming, as it ever was. An artist--with a
temperament--doesn't get old, any more than Peter Pan does. Paderewski's
furrowed face shows the artist's eternal striving; his music shows his
eternal youth, his faithfulness to the vision that furnishes his answer
to the eternal "Warum?"
This is the secret of Paderewski's white magic. He's still the supreme
god! Bauer plays perfectly within the rules--exquisitely and
powerfully--and misses the top height by the mere fraction of a mood,
the simple lack of a temperament; or, as O. Henry might have explained
it, by the unfortunate encumbrance of a forty-two-inch belt. Hofman has
an impatience with his medium, apparently, that leaves his hearer
unsatisfied with the piano; while Paderewski, though he transcends the
instrument, does so because of his love for the piano as a medium, and
forces his hearer to agree with him that it's the supreme one. Godowsky
forces things into the piano--pushes them in and makes them stay there;
Paderewski draws things out, always, and fills the world with them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account