The Little Review, March 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 1)Various
General
The Little Review, March 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 1)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
But if you’re talking about love.... In love you will act just like a
cave man or an Athenian or an early Christian or an Elizabethan or a
modern, like a satyr or a traveling salesman or an artist—it depends
upon your type. Governments may come and go, may change or cease to be,
and nothing remains forever except “your type.”
But it’s just here that your government has its functions. It can do
various things. And since the value of your life depends upon the
intensity with which you love something or somebody, you might as well
recognize what your government can do for you in this regard:
If you think that love and freedom ought to go together the government
can put you in prison.
If you marry out of respect for the government, and grow to hate each
other, the government won’t give you a divorce out of respect for you.
If you marry as a concession to the government, because you don’t want
to ruin your business or have your wife insulted, the government will
divorce you—and on the concession basis: but you pay for both the
concessions.
If you believe that love is love, whether it brings you children or not,
you may be happy and prosperous, but you will not be safe. The
government can put your physician in prison.
If you’re very poor or very ill, and ought not have children, the
government can keep information for prevention away from you; and it can
put any one who tries to give you that information in prison.
If you should die from an abortion—and you surely will die if you
contract blood-poisoning; and you surely will do that if you must be
treated in secrecy and without skill—the government can hang your
physician.
* * * * *
Why are you so crazy about the government?
Why do you want to govern anything or anybody?—even your own temper?
Nietzsche said not to preserve yourself but to discharge yourself! Why
not _use_ your temper as well as your nice moods?
Why do you want to govern your child? To give him character? But who
ever told you that life is for the making of character? Even if it were,
you can’t give your child character. He can get it by going through a
great deal. But if you govern him successfully he won’t go through a
great deal. He will just be something that is like something else. He
won’t be himself.
Why do you want to govern human nature? Because you want people to be
good instead of bad? But how can you tell when they’re good and when
they’re bad? Suppose you all agree that Jean Crones did a very bad
thing? If you knew Jean Crones you should probably all see at once that
he is a very good man—if he exists at all. Clear up your thinking!
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account