The Little Review, March 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 9) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, March 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 9)Various
General
The Little Review, March 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 9)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
And what is this about transgressing the piano? As you say, Paderewski
makes the piano capable of everything. That is what nearly all other
pianists have tried to do. But the piano isn’t capable of everything. It
is capable of some very special things, and Bauer is the first man to
prove it. He has stood for that all alone in a world of ignorant
criticism. No “spirit”? And then what do you mean by “out of the
ordinary in technical skill”? Is that one of your criterions of an art?
Don’t you remember Arthur Symons saying that it isn’t what you can
perform but what you can conceive?—_M. C. A._]
Alice Groff Again!
_Alice Groff, Philadelphia:_
In answer to Clive Bell, in the November issue, I would say, _words_ are
easy. What does “significant form” mean? Who is to decide what _is_
“significant form”? An art form may be divinely significant to one mind,
and be utterly insignificant, indeed without form at all, to another.
There is only one absolutely necessary condition to a good work of art,
without which indeed no work of art can be brought into being, even; and
that is: creative artistic faculty in the mind of some one artist. There
is no human being or group of human beings capable of deciding whether
such expression or embodiment of an artist’s creative faculty is a work
of art or not. The artist alone can decide as to his own work and leave
it to evolution and time to bring a portion at least of humanity to
agree with him. Meanwhile the petty critics continually spew out of
their mouths the greatest miracles of art that have ever been given to
the world.
[Answer this now, if words are so easy. I suppose if the sun were taken
out of the universe tomorrow everything would hold its place as now and
keep on going? The universe would hold without its significant form? Do
you think we are talking of the _shape_ of a vase when we say it has
significant form?
I don’t see where you get the word insignificant out of this talk
either. You are like those people who talk about good and bad art. There
isn’t any such thing as bad art: there is Art and rotten stuff.
And who decides whether or not a man has “creative artistic faculty”?
According to your generosity any one can elect himself an artist.
You are the woman who is always writing about art being the embodiment
of an ideal. What’s the ideal in _Œdipus Rex_ or in _Salome_ or in the
_Mona Lisa_—in any of them? And speaking of ideals, what is the art in
_Uncle Tom’s Cabin_?
“I am sick at my heart and I want to lie down.”—_An Artist._]
Let Them Fight It Out!
_Louise Gebhard Cann, Seattle:_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account