The Little Review, March 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 9)Various
General
The Little Review, March 1917 (Vol. 3, No. 9)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
When I was a little child I lived in a great asylum for the insane. It
was a world outside of the world, where realities had to be imagined and
where, even through those excursions in illusions and hallucinations,
there ran a strange loneliness. The world can never be as lonely in
those places where the mind has never come as in a place where the mind
has gone. There were no books to read in this place except the great
volumes in the Patients’ Library; and I had read them all. There was no
one to ask about anything. There was no way to make a connection with
“life.” Out there in the world they were working and thinking; here we
were still. Very early I had given up every one except the Insane. The
others knew nothing about anything, or knew only uninteresting facts.
From the Insane I could get everything. They knew everything about
nothing, and were my authority; but beyond that there was a silence. Who
had made the pictures, the books and the music in the world? And how had
they made them? And how could you tell the makers from just people? Did
they have a light around their heads? Were there any of them in the
world now? And would I ever see one? One day a name came to me suddenly.
Some one was talking of a “wicked French actress” who was touring
America:—“Sarah Bernhardt.” Even when _they_ said it the name had a
light around it! She would come as far as St. Louis. I would go at once.
But I was too little. I had no money.... I would run away. I would walk
the whole distance to her. But she would be gone before I could get
there.... Some day I would go to Paris. Other people had got that far. I
would go on living for that.
And then she came again! I was there, the first night, sitting in the
balcony with some other art students. We had sold our futures to sit so
close. I was burning with hot excitement and shaking with cold fear
until the moment—it was _Camille_—when the long french doors opened and
she came languidly and as if from a great distance; hands extended as if
balancing her exquisitely upon an enchanted atmosphere, her suave
voluptuous tawny head bent slightly down. I threw myself mind and soul
into the waves of that caressing fiery magic which swept out to us.
After this came a new agony: the critics had said there would never be
another. There was Duse, whom I have never seen; but she has always
filled me with a restless trouble. What artist has ever so dared to
offend Art? Never in all her life as an actress did she choose a play in
which her great art could come into its own. It always seems that there
is more laid upon the artist than a willingness to serve; it is almost a
command to serve. Did Duse deny the command and by so doing add the
martyrdom of Art to a great personal tragedy? Or was it because she
tried to create an art out of nature itself that Art revenged itself
upon her through nature? As an actress she had “no resources outside
simple human nature.” As a woman she had no resource in Art.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account