The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
With wild winged thoughts of which these remarks are vague memories I
took Change in my consciousness from the theatre. No thoughtful person
could have returned unchanged from the playhouse. The transitoriness of
religions, institutions, customs, and all other so-called fixtures which
constitute modern civilization is the tremendous fact that makes Change
a powerful supplement to social forces. Of course to the modern mind the
idea is already old, but to the primitive majority it is a prophecy.
The author tempered his mild radicalism with the hard-headed sagacity of
Sam Thatcher, a one-armed pointsman, who, while unintellectually aware
of the changelessness of change, "figured it out" that life is cyclic;
that as experience broadens the attitudes of men they lose their little
individualities in a common resignation, defeat, and decay, which to him
meant contentment. "I've been round the world some--round and round.
That's how things go--round and round--I know, round and round." Sam
thus epitomized an old theory which has so many supporters that it must
be wrong. But if we do not go "round and round" in what direction do we
go? Nobody knows. If our movement is circular there is the desperate
possibility of sufficient momentum to gain new territory by virtue of
centrifugal force. We can at least make the circle larger. Races have
bloomed, fruited, and passed; planets have shone for an abbreviated
eternity and disappeared; baffling facts about life-forms upon the earth
have come to light. Our conscious life is young, densely ignorant, and
full of pain; our instinctive life is ageless, has perfected its
knowledge and can endure, as it has endured, the aeons of change. We
shall some day get the idea of change into our consciousness.
Unthinkingly one might regret that Sam was clever enough to sway back
toward dogma those wavering minds which might otherwise have yielded to
the drama's punches. But his pathetically amusing romance should have
made it clear to respectable auditors flirting with new ideas that he
was not a competent critic of their particular class-slice of life. What
he said was reassuring, assuaging, brilliantly trite, and an untroubled
mind would take it and reject the austere, burning truth of the
essential message of the play.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account