The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Suppose, for the sake of argument, that the passage she quotes from the
hero really represents Wells's feeling about the relations between the
sexes. He believes that "under existing conditions" there is always
danger of love between men and women unless the man has one sole woman
intimate, and lets "a superficial friendship toward all other women veil
impassable abysses of separation." "M. M." wisely admits the truth of
that--in fact, it's the most obvious of truisms. Then the hero--or
Wells--goes on to say that this, to him, is an intolerable state of
affairs. For this "M. M." calls him "wicked," and "Mr. M. M." accuses
him of not being busy enough, and of not working for a living.
I wonder if "M. M." stopped to think exactly why the hero considers this
an intolerable state of affairs. The statement means nothing more than
that the man would like to have intimate friendships with more than one
woman. He doesn't say he wants to love more than one woman. Well, it is
easily conceivable that a man of active mind and companionability would
like to have some degree of intimacy with various women. There doesn't
seem to be anything wicked about that, and it's possible that he should
feel so even if he was "working for a living." If we confine ourselves
to one intimacy, we're likely to lose the full relish of it before many
years. The thought of that is certainly intolerable. A man who is close
to a good many people is usually better fitted to appreciate his best
friend. A woman novelist who has a conspicuously successful marriage put
it well the other day. "If you go into a room where there is a bunch of
violets," she said, "you are charmed by the odor. If you stay in the
room all the time, you forget about the odor--or it bores you. But if
you are continually going out and coming in again, it greets you every
time, and you learn to appreciate its subtleties." Perhaps "M. M."
thinks that reason is begging the question. Well, take the other side.
Any human being who is expanding has an insatiable desire for new
experience, new knowledge. That is the healthiest instinct in mankind.
Such a person would naturally fret at the inability to be intimate with
a new acquaintance who interests him. That feeling would not be wicked;
it would be right, by any sane standard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account