The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Woe to the Chambers and Herricks and Pooles and Dreisers and McCutcheons
and other best sellers! The enemy is raining in torrents, in avalanches.
What if the good, good public will be forced to taste the new food. What
if after having tasted it they will rebel and demand real meat
thereafter, rejecting as indigestible the canned affairs and the
oleomargarine surrogates. What if....
No danger, I am assured by my friend who has great faith in the
uncorruptible taste of the American public.
Surely no one will accuse the American publishers of being pure
idealists or Ford-like fanatics who are ready to squander their hard
dollars for propaganda purposes. Surely those gentlemen know their
market and adjust the supply to the demand. The extraordinary deluge of
Russian literature is evidently a paying proposition.
It is gratifying. We need the injection of new blood into our anemic
literature.
New blood. Not even Gogol is too old for us. No matter that he died in
1852. His _Dead Souls_, _Tarass Bulba_, and just published stories[2]
belong to the category of works that do not age in spite of their
technical flaws. If you use this perspective, _The Mantle_ will loom up
as the peak of Russian realism. “We have all come out of _The Mantle_”,
admitted Gogol’s disciple, Dostoevsky. If in that tale we recognize the
forerunner of the relentless soul-vivisectionists of the later days, we
get in the other stories a glimpse of the mystic Gogol, the poet of
Goyaesque witches and devils. Do not read _Viy_ before bed-time lest you
go through a heavy nightmare.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account