The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Well, along in his article Mr Zwaska grows boisterous at Lindsay who
has, supposedly working on a suggestion from his friend, James
Oppenheim, spoken of the possibility of a highly symbolic film
production of _The Book of the Dead_. And this because Mrs Moore of
Chicago, has worked out beautiful dances, and costumes and libretto for
a stage production of the wonderful Nile and Sun myth. Bless Mrs Lou
Wall Moore! We love her and her devotion. We have been wonder-struck by
the loveliness of her Egyptian costume designs. When she does produce
_The Book of the Dead_ we will, Fate permitting, make a pilgrimage from
this movie-ridden Missouri town to see it wherever it may he. And I know
that we will be rejoiced to be able to do so. But I am sure that dear
Mrs Moore would be the last person to object to a film production of
_The Book of the Dead_, _IF_ the production be a beautiful one. For, as
Lindsay iterates and reiterates, the stage and the moving-pictures
_MUST_ be different. Mrs Moore’s production will have “the splendor of
color, space, height, distance, and most magical of all, the voice.” And
the worthy moving-picture production, when it arrives, will have, in
black-and-white symphony, the infinite depths of the sky, waving palm
branches, the width of the desert, and above all, beautifully controlled
actors, streaming hundreds, directed and co-ordinated as was the
Diaghileff corps-de-ballet. And this beauty will travel all over the
country, touching, among others, this drama-starved town of Missouri,
where we suffer for want of visual beauty.
Mr Zwaska deplores the lack of composition—“moving lines” he calls it—in
the moving pictures. He says that he has seen it “only in the flight of
gulls (unconscious actors) or in pictures of rivers and trees, and the
sea; in short—Nature. But Nature is Nature” wailed Mr Zwaska. And pray,
why pervert the facts you bring forth? If the cinematograph can record
the beautiful motion of the birds, can it not equally well record the
beautiful motion of humans when the producer has learned to direct his
actors as M. Fokine directs his dancers? _There_ is room for Art.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account