The Little Review, November 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 7)Various
General
The Little Review, November 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 7)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
book; and when you’ve said something so directly that “it can never
again be said” it will have its effect, and when you’ve made a
contribution to pure thought it’s bound to have its effect for it’s the
confusion of tongues that keeps even the other kind (not impure but
unpure thought) from having its effect somewhere in an ineffectual
world—aside from the effect it will have on the world look at the
impetus it gives you. Here are you with twelve pages that you can tuck
under your arm any time, day or the black night between days, and march
straight up to heaven’s gate and demand a reckoning on. The end? when
you’ve here said twelve times over, for the first time, absolutely that
it’s ever been perfectly said: “No compromise”!
Would to God some judge—(he will; they will,—I was near showing a lack
of faith in the power of this thing you’ve done)—some judge _will_ step
down from his bench and leave a sentence unpronounced because the law
shan’t bind him to injustice. Some preacher _will_ come to his pulpit
with his manuscript a blank because he can’t compel his hand to write
more platitudes. A thousand artist hands will break the thing they’ve
chiseled at, and search their souls with yearning for the thing they
are. The end? This will be quoted. I refrain from mentioning the time
when all else is pied, including magazine magpies, and when the
arch-fiend has gathered disloyal architects and all their works.
This says: “Life is long.” This denies all that the poets have sung, and
the prophets have wailed and philosophy has deluded us with. If the
poets have gathered rosebuds while they may, this makes no haste to
gather thistles. If the Jeremiahs have said Woe! Woe! this says “Whoa”
once and compels it; and the philosophy of this thing, instead of
dividing art from its essence and proclaiming that art is long and life
is short, identifies life and art and says they’re both long—long
enough. Life is long enough for art—just. For art proves itself worthy
only as the work of the artist proves him able to work true while he
lives and proves him great in so far as his record shows him able to
live true while he works. Dauber was all wrong, if art is achievement,
or he could never have had it in him to do the thing he was to do and
yet lose his grip on the yard-arm however the wind blew; but he was
right, whether of life or of art, in his dying cry “It will go on.” He
knew you.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account