The Little Review, September 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 6)Various
General
The Little Review, September 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 6)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
A few years ago I went to the Falkland Islands to sheep-farm for a bare
subsistence, and while living on a lonely station twenty miles from
everywhere, so to speak, tending my flock, what time the half-breeds
came and helped themselves to my humble belongings, I experienced a new
emotion. Perhaps it would be more correct to say I became aware of the
nature of an old emotion. I felt the currents of transcendent energy
which I felt in my childhood. But I now felt them more frequently, and I
saw that I was elevated by them beyond the normal course of every-day
life. At such moments I forgot the sheep, the pastures and the marauding
half-breeds. I even forgot the strong colour and form of nature. I saw
something ridding me of solid things and leaving nothing but a fluid
universe. I saw distinct forms melting to formative motions. I had been
caught in the midst of an intense current—a transforming current of
livingness. Moreover, I was free to the current, with the result that I
became a part of itself—fluid—unresistingly, and was actuated
accordingly. For the time being, I moved as the fluid element most moved
me. Later reflection showed me that I was moved by some ineffable thing
which I believe to be poetry. It may be that the soul is made of poetry,
and after the human soul has freed itself from the fetters of
materialism it becomes re-converted to poetry; that is, a part of its
own flow or motion. I do not think materialists will understand this.
But it will be clear to the spiritual minded.
I am sure that the hypothesis, that poetry is simply soul-stuff, is a
verifiable one. I am convinced that in my Falkland Island days, whenever
I was raised by intensity out of my material self at a higher level than
actuality, whenever such intensity annihilated time and space,
obliterated that personality which I call Huntly Carter, lifted me to
the infinite and eternal and left me dumb, I was experiencing poetry. I
know that the hypothesis involves two assumptions. First, that poetry
cannot be written. It can only be expressed in motion or action. And it
can only be expressed by the person who receives it direct from its
source or fount. Hence a significant poet is not one who writes verse,
but one who lives poetry, _is_ poetry. The second assumption is that
every human being who possesses the smallest soul vibration possesses a
poetry-sense, and is, in fact, a potential poet. Given absolute freedom,
he, too, would become poetry, such is the power of conversion residing
in the element waiting to operate upon him. Which is not absurd when we
come to think of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account