The Little Review, September 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 6)Various
General
The Little Review, September 1915 (Vol. 2, No. 6)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
A first edition of _The Spoon River Anthology_ has been borrowed or
filched from our office. First editions are scarce, and we prize ours
beyond words. Will the guilty person please return it; or will any one
wishing to dispose of his at a reasonable price let us know about it?
The Reader Critic
“_CULTURE_”
_Richard Aldington, London_:
... It is almost impossible to get English people to subscribe to an
American literary review. English people are so conservative, so
self-satisfied, that it will be years and years and years and _years_
before they even become aware of the new spirit in America—and then it
will be more years and years and years before they will take it
seriously and still more years before they will _pay_ to know anything
of it. In a sense, you are more fortunate than we are—in England the big
circulating libraries have almost stopped the sale of new books, and
there is such an amazing mental lassitude that no one ever buys literary
and art periodicals. England is well behind the four other great
powers—France, Russia, Austria, and Germany. There seems to be a
tremendous Renaissance in Russia, but that comes, I think, from their
reading French stuff seriously. Have you ever tried to make an English
person—I expect it’s the same with Americans—read a new French book, a
book which has original ideas? If you haven’t, don’t!
... Is Comstock’s successor worse or better? It seems to me—who am
down-trodden by a corrupt aristocracy—amazing that the Great Republic
(?) should humbly let Comstock sit on its head for forty years; why even
in stodgy, money-bagged, hypocritical old England, someone would have
arisen—some Shaw—and assassinated him! There is no tyranny for the
artist comparable to that of an “enlightened” (God save us) democracy.
Notice that Vienna and Petrograd, the two capitals of benighted
feudalism, are, at this moment, the two great art centres of the world.
Paris has become a provincial town since the war; I don’t believe it
will recover—at least not for a decade.
_TO THE EDITOR, “WHO TENTS—INTENSE!”_
“_Ursus_”:
How dare you seek the adventure of beauty? To release, to joy, to clout
with hilarious freedom is to outguess the crowd. To outguess the crowd
is to encourage critical suicide in episodal splendor. The unknowable is
not wanted known; to venture is contagion.
Man ruts—knowingly, wilfully; slithers in purring abandon so long as
steaks fry and pieces of silver rattle in the pocket. When you attempt
to stir unthinking recesses, whip at latent possibilities, you prove
that you outclass, and he stares fishily from his Mongolian eyes. You
seek beauty; the average person tortures it! His father did not diet him
upon such. Your creed is not his. Mass brains chemicalize into a common
ingredient. Why precipitate? The world wants its filing cabinets to
contain regular, trimmed memos.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account