The Little Review, September 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 6)Various
General
The Little Review, September 1916 (Vol. 3, No. 6)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
You will find the facts of the case, about the five innocent people who
were indicted and why the Chamber of Commerce wanted them indicted, on
page twenty-nine. But what happened after the indictment is more
interesting and more horrible to me.
The five victims were put into jail. Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman
and a few other anarchists began a fight for them,—raising
money for lawyers, etc. The labor unions began to raise
money. After about three weeks of argument and hesitation
and won’t-it-be-better-to-go-a-little-slow and
is-it-advisable-to-distribute-pamphlets, etc., etc., no lawyer had been
engaged and none of the “workers” could agree about what “stand” to
take: would it be better to express sympathy openly with the
anarchists—(none of the five has ever claimed to be an anarchist, I
believe)—or would it be wiser to try to prove they were not anarchists,
or would it be safer to get a small lawyer who costs little and is worth
nothing or a big one who costs too much and might do something, or would
it be more expedient to keep out of it altogether, etc., etc., etc.,—or
shall we just do the best we can even if it isn’t much? Do you think
there was a single worker with the incredible inspiration to “do the
most we can and make sure that it is very much”? I saw Emma Goldman and
Berkman brooding over this strange and awful spectacle like two prophets
whose souls are slowly petrifying under the antics of their disciples.
Just here some one told me a story. Once upon a time Björnstjerne
Björnson, up in Norway, heard of a little French seamstress who was
accused of murder in Paris. She was poor and quite unbefriended and
there was practically no chance of her receiving justice. Björnson
hurried to Paris, took her case, and won it in the French courts, in
French, for the simple joy of doing something he believed in.
Can you imagine that happening in America? There isn’t a single labor
lawyer in the country who ever does it. If there are any who are willing
they are not able; if they are able they are not allowed. C. E. S. Wood
tried to do it for Caplan and Schmidt, but the workers themselves
prevented him from taking the case. They kept him trotting between
Portland and Los Angeles while they decided that it would be fatal to
have him come straight out with the fact that it was a labor fight.
Sometimes I imagine a young god springing up in labor ranks strong
enough to rush in and fight the courts for his people, young enough to
devote his life to it, naive enough to do it for an idea rather than for
a fee, and ironic enough to do it whether his people want it or not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account