to be a very remarkable defect. Considering the question merely in a
philosophical point of view, it can, I think, admit of no dispute that
the incentives to good actions can never be too numerous; but Volney,
from his peculiar notions, could only speak of morals as of physical
science, which, taken as a whole, it certainly is not. Whatever merit
this little tract may possess, therefore, it seems to be essentially
defective in attributing to one set of principles effects which they
never produce unless in combination with others.
In 1793 our traveller, whose political opinions were purely republican,
was imprisoned ten months as a _royalist_, and only recovered his
liberty after the events of the 9th of Thermidor. To console him in
some degree for this injustice, he was shortly afterward appointed
historical professor in the Normal School, which had just then been
established by the friends of order and of their country. Volney was
eminently well qualified to shine in this capacity. His reading,
which was immense, had lain much, if not chiefly, among historical
writers; and his calm, penetrating genius enabled him to discover with
extraordinary precision the natural chain of events. Nevertheless,
from a passion for vain paradox, which has of late been but too common
both in France and Germany among persons who would be thought to be
philosophers, he unfortunately exhibited in his historical researches
a degree of skepticism highly absurd. He had perhaps read and admired
the startling proposition of Aristotle, that doubt is the foundation of
all science; but if doubt eternally generate doubt, upon what basis are
the sciences to be erected? The Greek philosopher, I conceive, merely
intends to say, that without doubt there can be no inquiry, and without
inquiry no science. However, notwithstanding this radical defect,
Volney’s lectures at the Normal School were received with applause,
principally perhaps from the striking originality of the author’s
style, and the novelty of his views. Truths long and familiarly known,
appear to lose their beauty, and are eagerly exchanged for errors,
tricked out in all the dazzling gloss of novelty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account