His oratorical career was not of long duration. The Normal School was
quickly suppressed; and Volney, disgusted and fatigued with fruitless
endeavours to benefit his country, determined on deserting it for ever,
and seeking in the New World that tranquillity which he had failed to
find in the Old. On his arrival in the United States of America, in
1795, he was well received by Washington, who gave him many public
marks of his confidence and friendship. It is said, however, though I
know not upon what grounds, that John Adams, elected president in 1797,
entertained feelings highly inimical to Volney, who, a short time
before, had criticised severely, perhaps unjustly, his “Defence of the
Constitutions of the United States.” It is even insinuated by Durozoir,
whose unsupported testimony I should, however, refuse to accept in a
matter of this kind, that our traveller was driven from America by the
unmanly revenge of John Adams in the spring of 1798. Be this as it may,
he was suspected by the Americans of being engaged in a conspiracy
for delivering up Louisiana to the Directory; while in France, on the
other hand, he was accused of having asserted that Louisiana could
never become an advantageous possession of the French republic. While
his mind was thus harassed by contradictory and absurd suspicions, Dr.
Priestley published his “Observations on the Progress of Infidelity,”
&c., in which Volney, says Durozoir, who probably had no more read
Priestley’s pamphlet than I have, was denounced as an “atheist, an
ignoramus, a Chinese, and a Hottentot.” Priestley was no doubt a rough
polemic, too much addicted, perhaps, to hard names; but the work which
he denounced had, in many respects, a highly mischievous tendency, and
in refuting it some degree of warmth was pardonable.
On our traveller’s return to France, where he had been elected a member
of the Institute during his absence, he became once more intimately
connected with Napoleon, whom, in 1794, he had dissuaded from seeking
military employment in Turkey or Russia, and by his influence caused
to be restored to his rank in the army. Napoleon was not ungrateful,
and when elected to the consulate was desirous of naming Volney his
colleague. This dignity, however, the traveller refused, as well as
that of minister of the interior, which was soon afterward offered
him. He was content with the mere rank of senator. When at a future
period Napoleon was about to assume the title of emperor, Volney
ventured to oppose him, observing that _it were better to restore the
Bourbons_. From this time forward he was invariably found among that
small minority in the senate who condemned and opposed the despotic
measures of the emperor; yet he allowed himself to be decorated with
the rank of count, and the title of commandant of the Legion of Honour.
Still he took little share in political matters, preferring before all
distinctions retirement and study.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account