The London Burial Grounds: Notes on Their History from the Earliest Times to the Present Day — John Shaqi
The London Burial Grounds: Notes on Their History from the Earliest Times to the Present DayHolmes, Isabella M.
History
The London Burial Grounds: Notes on Their History from the Earliest Times to the Present Day
Holmes, Isabella M.
Cemeteries -- England -- London -- History
Yet the Churchyard was not only a religious centre, but was also a very
worldly one. Many unseemly scenes used to take place there, and the
ground was walled in because it was becoming the resort of those who did
not behave themselves properly. The following account from Maitland
gives us a sad, if a lively, picture of the times: “In the year 1569 a
Lottery was set on Foot in St. Paul’s Churchyard, where it was begun to
be drawn at the West Door of the Church on the 11th of January, and
continued incessantly drawing Day and Night till the 6th of May
following.” The Cathedral itself was put to a variety of unsuitable
uses, and was made a judgment-hall for foreign heretics who were
condemned to be burnt at Smithfield. The author of a tract written in
the second half of the sixteenth century describes the south aisle as
being used “for usury and popery, the north for simony, and the
horse-fair in the midst for all kinds of bargains, meetings, brawlings,
murthers, conspiracies; and the font for ordinary payments of money.”
Traffic in benefices was largely carried on there, and the middle aisle
(Paul’s Walk) was a rendezvous, every morning and afternoon, for a
fashionable and eccentric medley. Thus was the chief temple in London
treated as vilely as the Temple at Jerusalem, and there are those now
living amongst us who wish to see our English churches used for secular
purposes!
With one mighty blow the whole building was destroyed, and the beautiful
Gothic Cathedral became a heap of cinders. It is told in “Parentalia”
how, under the direction of Wren, the new St. Paul’s arose like a phœnix
from the ashes of the old church. From an interesting print of 1701 it
appears that the churchyard was even then a fashionable promenade, but
it is improbable that the building itself, in its new form, was ever
subjected to such abuses as the old one had been. I have heard Wren’s
churches described as “religious rather than Christian,” but as time
goes on the architecture seems to be more appreciated. Wordsworth has
said:—
“They dreamt not of a perishable home
Who thus could build,”
but he has also told us that the Cathedral is—
“Filled with mementoes, satiate with its past
Of grateful England’s overflowing Dead”—
and herein lies its chief interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account