The London Burial Grounds: Notes on Their History from the Earliest Times to the Present DayHolmes, Isabella M.
History
The London Burial Grounds: Notes on Their History from the Earliest Times to the Present Day
Holmes, Isabella M.
Cemeteries -- England -- London -- History
Twice I have had mud thrown at me, once by a woman in Cable Street, E.,
and once by a man in Silchester Road, W., but these were wholly
unprovoked attacks, in fact mere accidental occurrences. For my general
experience has been of the greatest consideration and politeness. I have
never been out of my way for the sake of idle curiosity, but have not
hesitated to go down any street or court or to knock at any door which
was in my way, and I have never had cause to regret it. An appearance of
utter insignificance and an air of knowing where you are going and what
you want, is the passport for all parts of London; and I have seen young
men and maidens, one moment indulging in the roughest play, the next
moment step off the pavement to let me pass. The clergy and others
always seem to think their own people the very worst. “You don’t know
what this neighbourhood is like,” I have heard over and over again, and
I am thankful I don’t. But as far as a superficial knowledge of the
streets goes they seem to be all much the same—north, south, east, and
west—and their frequenters too. To the children, at any rate, one need
never mind speaking. Poor little souls; they say “Miss,” or “Mum,” or
“Missus,” or “Teacher,” or “Sister,” or “Lady,” but they never answer
rudely.
Gravediggers and gardeners in cemeteries are generally communicative
people, who do not at all mind stopping their work for a bit, and
enlarging on the number of funerals, &c., which they daily witness. They
speak of the actual headstones and monuments by the surnames engraved
thereon, as, for instance, “Brown,” “Smith,” &c., and will point out a
particular grave as “four behind Smith over there, Smith is the tall
stone by the path; or if you look next to Wallace which has the shrub on
it,” and so on.
It is interesting to trace on maps of different dates the rise and fall
of a graveyard. First there is the actual field, which on some
particular day was acquired for the purpose. Then there is the
burial-ground formed and in use. Then the plot appears to be vacant—put
to no purpose, or used as a yard. Lastly buildings are on it, and the
graveyard has quite disappeared. One difficulty to be encountered needs
much study to overcome; it is the different names by which the same
ground is called in different books or plans. For instance, Chadwick
mentions in his list one called St. John’s, Borough, whereas the proper
name for this same ground is Butler’s burial-ground, Horselydown. As
another instance, and there are scores, it may be mentioned that the
Peel Grove burial-ground was called in some returns the North-east
London Cemetery, in others Cambridge Heath burial-ground, and in others
Keldy’s ground. Occasionally a graveyard is described as being “near the
free school,” or in some such vague terms, and it needs a knowledge of
the districts and the buildings in them, past and present, to be able to
locate some of these grounds which I have ventured to call “obscure.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account