The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
This quotation does not indicate, a dozen such could not exhaust, the
grace and charm of the episode in the Mendips. Here, perhaps, for a
moment in the midst of an unsatisfactory book Mr. Brett Young has
attained a higher level of achievement than ever before. His persons
do not here fade into the landscape, but rather blend with it into one
picture, of which they are as essential a part as the hills and clouds.
There is still, it must be confessed, a certain lack of vigour in the
presentation, but if the author could compose a whole book in this
manner it would be a very fine and remarkable performance. Perhaps he
may still do so. It would be very rash to decide at this moment that
the novel is not the form of art which he ought to pursue. But even
if we reserve judgment on this point, there can be no doubt that the
scheme of _The Young Physician_ is in any case not well adapted to his
particular gifts.
Mr. Compton Mackenzie, however, who invented and popularised this
kind of novel, has, in his latest production, thought fit to drop it.
It was indeed desirable, after the unfortunate affair of _Sylvia and
Michael_, that he should attempt to break new ground; but we think that
many of his admirers will read _Poor Relations_ in a mood of pleasure
mingled with dismay. One critic observed of _Guy and Pauline_ that the
future of the English novel was, to a quite considerable extent, in
Mr. Mackenzie's hands. But the future of the English novel does not
really lie in the direction of rattling books for railway journeys,
where humour is derived from cows, comic clergymen, and an overwhelming
hair-wash. Those who fixed Mr. Mackenzie with solemn expressions of
expectation on the ground of _Carnival_ and _Sinister Street_ will
probably be hard put to it to know what to make of this romping and
boisterous piece of work. It contains little more of what the author
has been praised for than his vitality--which was much diminished in
_Sylvia and Michael_--and his verbal ingenuity. But it does show high
spirits and an eye not blind to those obvious humorous effects, such
as bad wine, mischievous and inquisitive children, the nervous author
with his secretary, and so forth, which when they are whole-heartedly
embraced are, after all, still humorous. If the future of the English
novel really is in Mr. Mackenzie's hands and if he continues in his
present mood, the English novel is going to have a queer time of
it. But if he has done nothing else, he has proved himself free of
priggishness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account