The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
Among these novelists only two, Mr. Swinnerton and Mr. Lynch, much
concern themselves with what was once an urgent topic of conversation,
with the business, namely, of giving the novel shape and compactness.
This, it was at one time announced, was the direction in which English
fiction was moving, and perhaps it is still the most significant
movement, though it is accidentally a little veiled at present. But
Mr. Swinnerton, who is a novelist pure and simple, who follows no
extravagant theory, has no doctrinaire axe to grind, seems bent on
making shipwreck of his powers. Some novels can be written, as was
_Mademoiselle de Maupin_, in six weeks. But Mr. Swinnerton has not
yet written a novel like _Mademoiselle de Maupin_, nor does it appear
probable that he will do so. He seems to have fallen into the habit
of producing a cross between a good book and "the commercial article"
in good time for the autumn publishing season once a year. Thus are
the hopes raised by _Nocturne_ disappointed; and those who were
disconcerted but cheerful last year under the stroke administered by
_Shops and Houses_ will possibly falter in despair this year under
the more poignant blow of _September_. It is the theme of a beautiful
woman, whose placid life does not flower into passion until she is
nearing middle age. Cherry Mant, who hardly hurts Marian Forster by
tampering with the affections of her good fellow of a husband, wounds
her deeply by making off with her youthful lover, Nigel Sinclair; and
both acts of rapine are cleverly introduced by a silly joke about the
name of a brand of cigarettes. It is true: Mr. Swinnerton knows his
business. And if he has not the final fusing fire of genius, he has
talent in great quantities, experience, and knowledge and cleverness.
He has learnt his art, but rather than apply his learning he gives
us once a year the irritating phantom of a good book. His theme and
his conception of its treatment are excellent. But he will not pursue
sufficiently deeply his researches into character, and unless he can
resign himself to missing the season now and again, he will be lost to
the English novel. His is not one of those talents that shine in rash
and careless brilliance. It requires intensive labour to make the best
of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account