The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
On the whole the ten are versatile men, although no one of them could
come near in diversity of performance to the great Thomas Young, who
was not only a physicist of the first rank but also a physician, a
classical scholar, and one of the first successful decipherers of
Egyptian hieroglyphics. Rankine and Whewell were fair poets, and Clark
Maxwell deserves higher praise for his verses. His description of
Kelvin's reflecting galvanometer, in the form of a parody of Tennyson's
"Blow, bugle, blow," illustrates the ease and finish of his light verse:
O love! you fail to read the scale,
Correct to tenths of a division.
To mirror heaven those eyes were given,
And not for methods of precision--
Break, contact, break, set the free light-spot flying,
Break contact, rest thee magnet, swinging, creeping, dying.
The poem is quoted in the life of Kelvin, and two of Rankine's
songs are given. We hope that physicists can still show the same
accomplishment.
The lives are well written, and, while not a very profound contribution
to the history of the science, make very pleasant reading for scientist
and layman. There is, however, occasionally a lack of proportion, as
when Clark Maxwell's work on electro-magnetic waves receives little
attention compared to his other far less important achievements.
A LETTER FROM FRANCE
THE PRESENT STATE OF THE FRENCH NOVEL
_Paris, October, 1919._
In France as much as, and perhaps more than, in England the novel has
been since the eighteenth century the central massif of literature.
While in England the poets and the novelists formed two quite distinct
groups, while the poets Byron, Shelley, Wordsworth, Burns, Tennyson,
Swinburne remained pure poets, in France there have been few poets
who have not wished to write novels. Lamartine, Hugo, Musset, Vigny,
Gautier have done so. A pure critic like Sainte-Beuve wished, with
_Volupté_, to try his hand at the novel. Taine left in manuscript
the novel _Etienne Maylan_ and Renan the novel _Patrice_; they did
not publish these books because they recognised them to be mediocre,
but both wished to obtain the glory of the novelist. The novel is in
France the highest object of literary ambition. It alone assures a
position of material and social importance. Thus it is that a novelist
who is read by the upper and middle classes is necessarily admitted
to the Academy while a historian or a philosopher is admitted only in
exceptional circumstances, and great poets like Baudelaire, Gautier,
Banville, Paul Fort remain outside unless they have certain connections
and certain sources of support. The prosperity of the novel at a given
moment may then be considered, in France, as the most obvious mark of
a powerful literary activity. No form of literature addresses a larger
public, provokes more discussion, or gives more of its own colour to a
generation or to an epoch. I will endeavour to indicate here in a few
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account