The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
Writing of the life of Rankine, Professor P. G. Tait gave as his
opinion that "the life of a genuine scientific man is, from the common
point of view, almost always uneventful," and, if the man in question
has no interests but science, this is, in general, true. Engaged in
researches on the laws of nature, the most that he demands from life
is that he shall have his study, his laboratory, food, shelter and
peace, and such an attitude does not lead to high adventure or romances
of passion. Consequently, in writing biographies of physicists it is
advisable not to dwell too long on their everyday life, marriages and
meals, for there is a certain monotony about the material lives of
these great men. In the lives before us, which are little more than
sketches, the author has rightly laid most stress on the scientific
achievements of his ten physicists, but he has a tendency to reduce
his account to a catalogue of the discoveries and advances made. An
estimate of the place of each man in the thought of the time, and of
his scientific character, of the general tendencies of his work and the
place it now occupies in the history of the science, deserves to take a
rather larger place in these short biographies than it has received.
Happily many of the ten are men of very interesting personality.
The selection--James Clerk Maxwell, W. J. M. Rankine, P. G. Tait,
Lord Kelvin, Charles Babbage, William Whewell, Sir G. G. Stokes, Sir
G. B. Airy, J. C. Adams, and Sir J. F. W. Herschel--if based on no
clearly-defined plan, has the merit that it includes one or two men who
have been unduly neglected. Rankine, in spite of his important work on
thermodynamics, does not receive much attention from the physicists of
to-day, possibly owing to his unattractive "molecular vortices," and
Babbage is known to most people rather from the sneer in the _Ingoldsby
Legends_:
Master Cabbage, the steward, who'd made a machine
To calculate with, and count noses--I ween
The cleverest thing of its kind ever seen,
than for his really great, though imperfect, achievements. Why Babbage
is set down as a physicist, when his whole effort was devoted to the
perfecting of calculating machines, we do not know, but the life is
one of the most interesting, and makes an attempt to expound the
causes--obvious enough, perhaps--of his misfortunes. It is a generous
appreciation of an ill-starred genius, now seldom heard of. Whewell,
again, is scarcely known as a physicist, but rather as the historian
of inductive science; we suppose that his writings on the tides have
secured him his place. Joule is mentioned in early life, and was
certainly one of the leading physicists of the century, yet he is not
among the selected ten--neither, for that matter, is Faraday, so it is
evident that scientific prowess has not been the test of admission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account