The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
To the most hardened critic the sounding title of the International
Society of Sculptors, Painters, and Engravers may seem a little
overaweing; each time, as the Society's exhibition comes round, he must
feel this peculiar thrill; the catalogue also, with its crescendos of
lay members, honorary lay members, and deceased honorary lay members,
has a conscious feeling of "well-to-do-ness" which is very impressive,
and may tend to undermine impartial judgment. The twenty-sixth
exhibition of this Society is, notwithstanding, very like many others
which have gone before. A long search for instances of any serious
purpose, with a few exceptions, meets with nothing but superficial
cleverness or work of a purely negative value. As in the exhibitions
of Burlington House, so here, the artists seem entirely concerned with
the portrayal of the anecdote for itself, without the least regard for
design, in fact with the least amount of solid purpose or feeling, and
with the free use of cheap _bravura_ painting. There are, of course,
the well-known stand-bys who provide what is expected of them with
satisfactory regularity. Mr. MacEvoy's portraits of the nobility and
gentry seem more and more evanescent, and one would hardly credit them
with a drop of red blood, let alone blue--but they have their charm.
The portraits in general are not peculiarly interesting, characterised
as they are by good but uninspired painting. Mr. Frampton's No. 29 is
a case in point. The only bright exception, both as a portrait and a
work of art, is Mr. Alvaro Guevara's portrait of Miss Edith Sitwell,
which alone is worth paying 1s. 6d. to see. The painting throughout is
curiously realistic, the colour is very fine, and the arrangement of
the figure so as to present a view looking down upon it, together with
the placing of the mats on the floor, make a most interesting design.
Placed as it is among the portraits of Mr. MacEvoy, the contrast is
startling and a little cruel, not unlike a bird of paradise amongst a
batch of ring-doves. I am surprised to see that the perseverance of the
firm of Nicholson and Son, though the business is now mostly carried on
by Mr. Benjamin Nicholson, has not yet been awarded by royal warrant.
No one, I hope, will be so obtuse as not to distinguish the filial from
the paternal jug. Considerable mention has been made of the landscapes
in water-colour by Miss Frances Hodgkins, and though I cannot
quite agree with all that has been said, I think her work has charm
and a strong sense of pattern. No. 214, _Threshing_, is especially
attractive. The drawings of J. D. Revel will repay attention,
particularly No. 194. Mr. Keith Baynes contributes two pleasing
drawings, one of which has an interesting design of boats, while Mr.
William Rothenstein has a good but very war-like self-portrait. I
feel glad my acquaintance with him has been so far only in a civilian
capacity. It would appear that sheep-skin jerkins are regulation dress
for official war-artists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account